Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] random: remove batched entropy locking

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

On 2022-02-09 13:56:43 [+0100], Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Rather than use spinlocks to protect batched entropy, we can instead
> disable interrupts locally, since we're dealing with per-cpu data, and
> manage resets with a basic generation counter. At the same time, we
> can't quite do this on PREEMPT_RT, where we still want spinlocks-as-
> mutexes semantics. So we use a local_lock_t, which provides the right
> behavior for each. Because this is a per-cpu lock, that generation
> counter is still doing the necessary CPU-to-CPU communication.
> 
> This should improve performance a bit. It will also fix the linked splat
> that Jonathan received with a PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING=y.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YfMa0QgsjCVdRAvJ@latitude/
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Sebastian