From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603C5C433F5 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241062AbiBOP4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:56:34 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:53454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241067AbiBOP41 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:56:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C306FA6452; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:56:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id p9so12351056wra.12; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:56:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=L8pD5pTeZRDlCwsrtjOaMUOCMqHiT6qC1hC1m5nk1Nw=; b=ggddP0PPikdQWCi0iGr+20aK6yQ6gvPybEbWMhCG9D8nbvd0GX9hpItLzKrU6F8Thw H9nLWnxPIBS7sr6kwBlhq0FGC1vexgJ/WsnD20DN8IUagXRl8TUQx4gaIBhAumi4jBHo O7wIMptdVJLtZZJBC70WnQKWV+0hcKnWg+6cjdWkrzG2Oo5q4dHH2X/EWVHVTzv4Z5vk s/Er5qyoKN/Dc2KkYqFazDyS/zZEp4aQElcs+V/fgTb9q4pgOmRFcNlD5xzlcZqVA03r vG7vQ1pRK5g94dVdkEwWoEqV/kxmntgF2bJww1WTYJBoLvsajSFY05EaFZ/gjdjmGMac 8Deg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=L8pD5pTeZRDlCwsrtjOaMUOCMqHiT6qC1hC1m5nk1Nw=; b=Z4eL6aLFCfRBcH3fDiNscaJF2/x15/POJni0pTwsvep+ZmSpnfC+3tx8ytsIk9kG5r tFs8NzxXx4O4M5Ain6c59VBHcY8MEybtWfEvlTsONI6e3Z3ToVT5B8h78mCHTxUq77uM c0UzKVw4/LSqgLq0xQByfy98mQ1pfbiXVuyeKLybB+Q1WMipXmtVGTY1K97m1/iTmXlq 1QfCu4cc8LhVxelyJmTPjJSYiAV/G8RGQF6WYi9LXAQHiVBuRzcWiz6J1vTZ1UIIBl48 TmoMdoZXHWM5AgGNi7d47VlPLp7IDl6VS1Q4Mhm7KQE2321I0q6jCeJta5zFTz2RFVZC 4CbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gfZMwm355W9UDObfEwnkd+2yriWToX0ln7zwk4FuTTGiEsAdz oLQQ4k7ufeBNVStM8TaSNq0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaTXX/oYARKTiObf9aX6tUeT9wQGHNWODjX+ABwp6AdVfMoKGLK3kd5yQqmVdNF4rCcsKlWQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e109:: with SMTP id t9mr3872501wrz.73.1644940575420; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t16sm6793301wmq.43.2022.02.15.07.56.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:56:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:56:13 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/172] 5.15.24-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220214092506.354292783@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220214092506.354292783@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:24:18AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.24 release. > There are 172 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:36 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 62 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220213): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/764 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/766 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/767 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip