From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86: warn on incorrectly NULL static calls
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:10:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgvekYk2QEIzOc+T@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214131614.3050333-4-pbonzini@redhat.com>
For the shortlog, it's not the "static call" that's incorrectly NULL, it's the
kvm_x86_ops.func that's wrong. E.g. yank out static calls and KVM could still
keep the WARN.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Use the newly corrected KVM_X86_OP annotations to warn about possible
> NULL pointer dereferences as soon as the vendor module is loaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e3f7d958c150..5dce6fbd9ab6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1546,9 +1546,10 @@ extern struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops;
>
> static inline void kvm_ops_static_call_update(void)
> {
> -#define KVM_X86_OP(func) \
> +#define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(func) \
> static_call_update(kvm_x86_##func, kvm_x86_ops.func);
> -#define KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL KVM_X86_OP
> +#define KVM_X86_OP(func) \
> + WARN_ON(!kvm_x86_ops.func); KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(func)
As before, I'd prefer that we not have a KVM_X86_OP => KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL
dependency and instead have a common __KVM_X86_OP for this one case.
> #include <asm/kvm-x86-ops.h>
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 13:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] kvm: x86: better handling of optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-14 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: x86: use static_call_cond for optional callbacks Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-15 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-14 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: x86: remove KVM_X86_OP_NULL and mark optional kvm_x86_ops Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-15 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-15 17:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-14 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86: warn on incorrectly NULL static calls Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-15 17:10 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-02-14 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: x86: make several APIC virtualization callbacks optional Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-15 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-14 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls Paolo Bonzini
2022-02-15 17:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-15 18:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgvekYk2QEIzOc+T@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.