From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Use advertised caps/min_interval as default sample_period
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:02:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhYGQO+DPwcWyT8i@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220223011436.GA414932@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:14:36AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:10:42PM +0000, German Gomez wrote:
> > When recording SPE traces, the default sample_period is currently being
> > set to 1 in the perf_event_attr fields, instead of the value advertised
> > in '/sys/devices/arm_spe_0/caps/min_interval':
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> > [...]
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 1
> > [...]
> >
> > Use the value from the above sysfs location as a more sensible default
> > (it was already being read, but the value not being used)
> >
> > After:
> >
> > $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> > [...]
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 1024
> > [...]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
>
> The change looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Use advertised caps/min_interval as default sample_period
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:02:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhYGQO+DPwcWyT8i@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220223011436.GA414932@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Em Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:14:36AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:10:42PM +0000, German Gomez wrote:
> > When recording SPE traces, the default sample_period is currently being
> > set to 1 in the perf_event_attr fields, instead of the value advertised
> > in '/sys/devices/arm_spe_0/caps/min_interval':
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> > [...]
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 1
> > [...]
> >
> > Use the value from the above sysfs location as a more sensible default
> > (it was already being read, but the value not being used)
> >
> > After:
> >
> > $ perf record -e arm_spe// -vv -- sleep 1
> > [...]
> > { sample_period, sample_freq } 1024
> > [...]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
>
> The change looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-23 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 17:10 [PATCH] perf arm-spe: Use advertised caps/min_interval as default sample_period German Gomez
2022-02-21 17:10 ` German Gomez
2022-02-23 1:14 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-23 1:14 ` Leo Yan
2022-02-23 10:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-02-23 10:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YhYGQO+DPwcWyT8i@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.