All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
	"D . Scott Phillips" <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:56:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi9zuL8RZyYu1dVL@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35344252-5284-b08e-fec7-6dc99476b4b0@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:37:21AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 19:26, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:07PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2022 18:49, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:03:07PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >>>> On 08/03/2022 12:04, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 11:30, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> IMHO, if core_mask weight is 1, MC will be removed/degenerated anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is what I get on my Ampere Altra (I guess I don't have the ACPI
> >>>> changes which would let to a CLS sched domain):
> >>>>
> >>>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu0/domain*/name
> >>>> DIE
> >>>> NUMA
> >>>> root@oss-altra01:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep SCHED_CLUSTER
> >>>> CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to follow up on this. Would you share your dmidecode BIOS
> >>> Information section?
> >>
> >> # dmidecode -t 0
> >> # dmidecode 3.2
> >> Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
> >> SMBIOS 3.2.0 present.
> >>
> >> Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 26 bytes
> >> BIOS Information
> >> 	Vendor: Ampere(TM)
> >> 	Version: 0.9.20200724
> >> 	Release Date: 2020/07/24
> >> 	ROM Size: 7680 kB
> >> 	Characteristics:
> >> 		PCI is supported
> >> 		BIOS is upgradeable
> >> 		Boot from CD is supported
> >> 		Selectable boot is supported
> >> 		ACPI is supported
> >> 		UEFI is supported
> >> 	BIOS Revision: 5.15
> >> 	Firmware Revision: 0.6
> >>
> > 
> > Thank you, I'm following internally and will get with you.
> 
> Looks like in my PPTT, the `Processor Hierarchy Nodes` which represents
> cluster nodes have no valid `ACPI Processor ID`.

Thanks, I'm looking for the right person to get us the latest information
available this. Will follow up once I have.

-- 
Darren Hart
Ampere Computing / OS and Kernel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Darren Hart <darren@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
	"D . Scott Phillips" <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 09:56:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi9zuL8RZyYu1dVL@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <35344252-5284-b08e-fec7-6dc99476b4b0@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:37:21AM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 19:26, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:07PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2022 18:49, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:03:07PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> >>>> On 08/03/2022 12:04, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 11:30, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> IMHO, if core_mask weight is 1, MC will be removed/degenerated anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is what I get on my Ampere Altra (I guess I don't have the ACPI
> >>>> changes which would let to a CLS sched domain):
> >>>>
> >>>> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/cpu0/domain*/name
> >>>> DIE
> >>>> NUMA
> >>>> root@oss-altra01:~# zcat /proc/config.gz | grep SCHED_CLUSTER
> >>>> CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER=y
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to follow up on this. Would you share your dmidecode BIOS
> >>> Information section?
> >>
> >> # dmidecode -t 0
> >> # dmidecode 3.2
> >> Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
> >> SMBIOS 3.2.0 present.
> >>
> >> Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 26 bytes
> >> BIOS Information
> >> 	Vendor: Ampere(TM)
> >> 	Version: 0.9.20200724
> >> 	Release Date: 2020/07/24
> >> 	ROM Size: 7680 kB
> >> 	Characteristics:
> >> 		PCI is supported
> >> 		BIOS is upgradeable
> >> 		Boot from CD is supported
> >> 		Selectable boot is supported
> >> 		ACPI is supported
> >> 		UEFI is supported
> >> 	BIOS Revision: 5.15
> >> 	Firmware Revision: 0.6
> >>
> > 
> > Thank you, I'm following internally and will get with you.
> 
> Looks like in my PPTT, the `Processor Hierarchy Nodes` which represents
> cluster nodes have no valid `ACPI Processor ID`.

Thanks, I'm looking for the right person to get us the latest information
available this. Will follow up once I have.

-- 
Darren Hart
Ampere Computing / OS and Kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04 17:01 [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings Darren Hart
2022-03-04 17:01 ` Darren Hart
2022-03-08 10:30 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-08 10:30   ` Will Deacon
2022-03-08 10:45   ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-08 10:45     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-08 11:04   ` Vincent Guittot
2022-03-08 11:04     ` Vincent Guittot
2022-03-08 16:03     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-08 16:03       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-08 17:49       ` Darren Hart
2022-03-08 17:49         ` Darren Hart
2022-03-09 12:50         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-09 12:50           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-09 18:26           ` Darren Hart
2022-03-09 18:26             ` Darren Hart
2022-03-14  9:37             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-14  9:37               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-14 16:56               ` Darren Hart [this message]
2022-03-14 16:56                 ` Darren Hart
2022-03-16 14:42                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-16 14:42                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-14 16:35             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-14 16:35               ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-14 16:54               ` Darren Hart
2022-03-14 16:54                 ` Darren Hart
2022-03-16 14:48                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-16 14:48                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2022-03-16 15:20                   ` Darren Hart
2022-03-16 15:20                     ` Darren Hart
2022-03-16 15:55                     ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-16 15:55                       ` Sudeep Holla
2022-03-21 14:30                       ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 14:30                         ` Will Deacon
2022-03-21 15:56                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-21 15:56                           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-03-14 21:29               ` [PATCH] arch_topology: Swap MC & CLS SD mask if MC weight==1 & kernel test robot
2022-03-14 21:29                 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-14 23:02               ` kernel test robot
2022-03-14 23:02                 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-17  6:10 ` [PATCH v3] topology: make core_mask include at least cluster_siblings Barry Song
2022-03-17  6:10   ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yi9zuL8RZyYu1dVL@fedora \
    --to=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.