Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] SubmittingPatches: explain why we care about log messages

[Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:02:59AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> Extend the "describe your changes well" section to cover whom we are
> trying to help by doing so in the first place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> index 7225a0fb52..a6121d1d42 100644
> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -110,6 +110,35 @@ run `git diff --check` on your changes before you commit.
>  [[describe-changes]]
>  === Describe your changes well.
>  
> +The log message that explains your changes is just as important as the
> +changes themselves.  Your code may be clearly written with in-code
> +comment to sufficiently explain how it works with the surrounding
> +code, but those who need to fix or enhance your code in the future
> +will need to know _why_ your code does what it does, for a few
> +reasons:
> +
> +. Your code may be doing something differently from what you wanted it
> +  to do.  Writing down what you actually wanted to achieve will help
> +  them fix your code and make it do what it should have been doing
> +  (also, you often discover your own bugs yourself, while writing the
> +  log message to summarize the thought behind it).
> +
> +. Your code may be doing things that were only necessary for your
> +  immediate needs (e.g. "do X to directories" without implementing or
> +  even designing what is to be done on files).  Writing down why you
> +  excluded what the code does not do will help guide future developers.
> +  Writing down "we do X to directories, because directories have
> +  characteristic Y" would help them infer "oh, files also have the same
> +  characteristic Y, so perhaps doing X to them would also make sense?".
> +  Saying "we don't do the same X to files, because ..." will help them
> +  decide if the reasoning is sound (in which case they do not waste
> +  time extending your code to cover files), or reason differently (in
> +  which case, they can explain why they extend your code to cover
> +  files, too).
> +
> +The goal of your log message is to convey the _why_ behind your
> +change to help future developers.
> +

This is pretty compelling. Is it clear enough why we care about this in
the commit message, as opposed to in the patch description (cover letter
or post-"---" blurb)? Is it too obvious to explicitly mention that the
commit message is the first thing we try to make sense of during a 'git
blame' or 'git bisect'?

Either way, I think this is an improvement on the doc as it was before.

Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>

>  The first line of the commit message should be a short description (50
>  characters is the soft limit, see DISCUSSION in linkgit:git-commit[1]),
>  and should skip the full stop.  It is also conventional in most cases to
> -- 
> 2.35.0-177-g7d269f5170
>