All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xkernel.wang@foxmail.com
Cc: linux@dominikbrodowski.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	pombredanne@nexb.com, arnd@arndb.de, luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/initramfs.c: check the return value of kstrdup()
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:14:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiIesoVGiVm2KcUD@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_DE1C3D1422E1DD4A35FFDE2048CC48B94E08@qq.com>

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +0800, xkernel.wang@foxmail.com wrote:
> From: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
> 
> kstrdup() is also a memory allocation function which is similar
> with kmalloc() in some way. Once some internal memory errors
> happen, it will return NULL. It is better to check the return
> value of it so to catch the memory error in time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoke Wang <xkernel.wang@foxmail.com>
> ---
>  init/initramfs.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/initramfs.c
> index a842c05..49deffb 100644
> --- a/init/initramfs.c
> +++ b/init/initramfs.c
> @@ -139,8 +139,12 @@ static void __init dir_add(const char *name, time64_t mtime)
>  	struct dir_entry *de = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dir_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!de)
>  		panic_show_mem("can't allocate dir_entry buffer");
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&de->list);
>  	de->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!de->name) {

How can this fail?  Have you ever hit this in real life?

> +		kfree(de);
> +		panic_show_mem("can't duplicate dir name");

Why are you freeing memory if you are panicing?

How was this tested?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-04  9:27 [PATCH] init/initramfs.c: check the return value of kstrdup() xkernel.wang
2022-03-04 14:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-03-04 15:55   ` Xiaoke Wang
2022-03-07  1:28 ` Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-13 20:51 kernel test robot
2021-12-13  8:58 Xiaoke Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YiIesoVGiVm2KcUD@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=xkernel.wang@foxmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.