From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 23:02:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yj5KCqtu7KZiGtgN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e64d9972-339c-c661-afbd-38f1f2ea476a@maciej.szmigiero.name>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> So, what's the plan here: is your patch set Sean considered to supersede
> Maxim's earlier proposed changes or will you post an updated patch set
> incorporating at least some of them?
Next step is to reach a consensus on how we want to solve the problem (or if we
can't reach consensus, until Paolo uses his special powers). I definitely won't
post anything new until there's more conversation.
> I am asking because I have a series that touches the same general area
> of KVM [1] and would preferably have it based on the final form of the
> event injection code to avoid unforeseen negative interactions between
> these changes.
I don't think you need to do anything, at a glance your changes are orthogonal
even though they have similar themes. Any conflicts should be minor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 3:27 [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86: Return immediately from x86_emulate_instruction() on code #DB Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 02/21] KVM: nVMX: Unconditionally purge queued/injected events on nested "exit" Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 03/21] KVM: VMX: Drop bits 31:16 when shoving exception error code into VMCS Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 04/21] KVM: x86: Don't check for code breakpoints when emulating on exception Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 05/21] KVM: nVMX: Treat General Detect #DB (DR7.GD=1) as fault-like Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 06/21] KVM: nVMX: Prioritize TSS T-flag #DBs over Monitor Trap Flag Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 07/21] KVM: x86: Treat #DBs from the emulator as fault-like (code and DR7.GD=1) Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 08/21] KVM: x86: Use DR7_GD macro instead of open coding check in emulator Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 09/21] KVM: nVMX: Ignore SIPI that arrives in L2 when vCPU is not in WFS Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 10/21] KVM: nVMX: Unconditionally clear mtf_pending on nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 11/21] KVM: VMX: Inject #PF on ENCLS as "emulated" #PF Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 12/21] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_x86_ops.queue_exception to inject_exception Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 13/21] KVM: x86: Make kvm_queued_exception a properly named, visible struct Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 14/21] KVM: x86: Formalize blocking of nested pending exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 15/21] KVM: x86: Use kvm_queue_exception_e() to queue #DF Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 16/21] KVM: x86: Hoist nested event checks above event injection logic Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 17/21] KVM: x86: Evaluate ability to inject SMI/NMI/IRQ after potential VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 18/21] KVM: x86: Morph pending exceptions to pending VM-Exits at queue time Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 19/21] KVM: VMX: Update MTF and ICEBP comments to document KVM's subtle behavior Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] KVM: selftests: Use uapi header to get VMX and SVM exit reasons/codes Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] KVM: selftests: Add an x86-only test to verify nested exception queueing Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 16:30 ` [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-13 9:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-24 21:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-25 21:25 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-25 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-03-26 0:21 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-27 15:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-28 17:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-29 10:45 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-29 15:43 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yj5KCqtu7KZiGtgN@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.