From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:16:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjBnet2813sEGjZY@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba2c49da-22c5-06ea-e953-82211b953ca8@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 06:24:19PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Perhaps changing it something like below. What do you think?
I think the structure looks good, but I'm not sure about updating
e.g. ptq->last_cy_insn_cnt in both functions? Does that make sense?
I ran this and found something strange: I've started getting some hits
(very small amounts, e.g. 0.14%) on instructions that are not branches.
How can that happen?
/* Steinar */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 9:38 [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-11 9:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-11 17:42 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-14 16:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-15 10:16 ` Steinar H. Gunderson [this message]
2022-03-15 11:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-15 18:00 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-15 20:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-16 8:19 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-16 11:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-16 12:59 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 9:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-21 10:33 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 13:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-21 16:58 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-21 17:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2022-03-22 11:57 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-29 12:31 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2022-03-29 14:16 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjBnet2813sEGjZY@google.com \
--to=sesse@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.