Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Introduce CanoKey QEMU

["Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@zenithal.me>]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 09:29:47PM +0800, Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there any further feedback on this patch set.
> 
> Sorry for the looong delay, I'm rather busy with edk2.

Fully understandable. There is also delay on my side, sorry for that
too.

> 
> Tried to queue up this, noticed it breaks the build in case the
> canokey library is not installed.

Yes, this is my fault. I forgot to put `softmmu_ss.add(canokey)`
inside a `if canokey.found()` conditional check.

I've fixed it with 
https://gitlab.com/ZenithalHourlyRate/qemu/-/commit/5d8604c70abefc8146dbb4f7836f3215bc9df966
which will be contained in v5.

> 
> I'd suggest to run the patch series through the qemu gitlab CI
> before sending out v5.

I have gone through qemu gitlab CI and the result is in
https://gitlab.com/ZenithalHourlyRate/qemu/-/pipelines/497317417
Except check-dco and check-patch (I only generate Signed-off-by line
when `git format-patch`), other failed checks are "allowed to fail" and
I've checked the log, these failures are about Debian RISC-V packages
instead of qemu itself.

Is this appropriate for sending out v5?

By the way, we are planning to separate libcanokey-qemu.so
from canokey-core to a dedicated repo at
https://github.com/canokeys/canokey-qemu
(not done yet), which would result in changes in documentation.
I will contain these changes in v5 once we are done.

> 
> take care,
>   Gerd
> 

Regards,

Hongren