From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Cc: alexanderduyck@fb.com, linyunsheng@huawei.com, hawk@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] skbuff: fix coalescing for page_pool fragment recycling
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:36:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkYCwi8X1EC1sm87@hades> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331102440.1673-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:24:41AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Fix a use-after-free when using page_pool with page fragments. We
> encountered this problem during normal RX in the hns3 driver:
>
> (1) Initially we have three descriptors in the RX queue. The first one
> allocates PAGE1 through page_pool, and the other two allocate one
> half of PAGE2 each. Page references look like this:
>
> RX_BD1 _______ PAGE1
> RX_BD2 _______ PAGE2
> RX_BD3 _________/
>
> (2) Handle RX on the first descriptor. Allocate SKB1, eventually added
> to the receive queue by tcp_queue_rcv().
>
> (3) Handle RX on the second descriptor. Allocate SKB2 and pass it to
> netif_receive_skb():
>
> netif_receive_skb(SKB2)
> ip_rcv(SKB2)
> SKB3 = skb_clone(SKB2)
>
> SKB2 and SKB3 share a reference to PAGE2 through
> skb_shinfo()->dataref. The other ref to PAGE2 is still held by
> RX_BD3:
>
> SKB2 ---+- PAGE2
> SKB3 __/ /
> RX_BD3 _________/
>
> (3b) Now while handling TCP, coalesce SKB3 with SKB1:
>
> tcp_v4_rcv(SKB3)
> tcp_try_coalesce(to=SKB1, from=SKB3) // succeeds
> kfree_skb_partial(SKB3)
> skb_release_data(SKB3) // drops one dataref
>
> SKB1 _____ PAGE1
> \____
> SKB2 _____ PAGE2
> /
> RX_BD3 _________/
>
> In skb_try_coalesce(), __skb_frag_ref() takes a page reference to
> PAGE2, where it should instead have increased the page_pool frag
> reference, pp_frag_count. Without coalescing, when releasing both
> SKB2 and SKB3, a single reference to PAGE2 would be dropped. Now
> when releasing SKB1 and SKB2, two references to PAGE2 will be
> dropped, resulting in underflow.
>
> (3c) Drop SKB2:
>
> af_packet_rcv(SKB2)
> consume_skb(SKB2)
> skb_release_data(SKB2) // drops second dataref
> page_pool_return_skb_page(PAGE2) // drops one pp_frag_count
>
> SKB1 _____ PAGE1
> \____
> PAGE2
> /
> RX_BD3 _________/
>
> (4) Userspace calls recvmsg()
> Copies SKB1 and releases it. Since SKB3 was coalesced with SKB1, we
> release the SKB3 page as well:
>
> tcp_eat_recv_skb(SKB1)
> skb_release_data(SKB1)
> page_pool_return_skb_page(PAGE1)
> page_pool_return_skb_page(PAGE2) // drops second pp_frag_count
>
> (5) PAGE2 is freed, but the third RX descriptor was still using it!
> In our case this causes IOMMU faults, but it would silently corrupt
> memory if the IOMMU was disabled.
>
> Change the logic that checks whether pp_recycle SKBs can be coalesced.
> We still reject differing pp_recycle between 'from' and 'to' SKBs, but
> in order to avoid the situation described above, we also reject
> coalescing when both 'from' and 'to' are pp_recycled and 'from' is
> cloned.
>
> The new logic allows coalescing a cloned pp_recycle SKB into a page
> refcounted one, because in this case the release (4) will drop the right
> reference, the one taken by skb_try_coalesce().
>
> Fixes: 53e0961da1c7 ("page_pool: add frag page recycling support in page pool")
> Suggested-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220328132258.78307-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220324172913.26293-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index ea51e23e9247..2d6ef6d7ebf5 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -5244,11 +5244,18 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
> if (skb_cloned(to))
> return false;
>
> - /* The page pool signature of struct page will eventually figure out
> - * which pages can be recycled or not but for now let's prohibit slab
> - * allocated and page_pool allocated SKBs from being coalesced.
> + /* In general, avoid mixing slab allocated and page_pool allocated
> + * pages within the same SKB. However when @to is not pp_recycle and
> + * @from is cloned, we can transition frag pages from page_pool to
> + * reference counted.
> + *
> + * On the other hand, don't allow coalescing two pp_recycle SKBs if
> + * @from is cloned, in case the SKB is using page_pool fragment
> + * references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only take full page
> + * references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would result in
> + * inconsistent reference counts.
> */
> - if (to->pp_recycle != from->pp_recycle)
> + if (to->pp_recycle != (from->pp_recycle && !skb_cloned(from)))
> return false;
>
> if (len <= skb_tailroom(to)) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-31 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 10:24 [PATCH net v3] skbuff: fix coalescing for page_pool fragment recycling Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-31 11:00 ` Yunsheng Lin
2022-03-31 18:44 ` Alexander Duyck
2022-04-01 5:21 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-03-31 19:36 ` Ilias Apalodimas [this message]
2022-04-01 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkYCwi8X1EC1sm87@hades \
--to=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.