From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 4/5] net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:32:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkyLR+VBb81npXnC@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405172049.slomqla4pmnyczbj@sx1>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:20:49AM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 05 Apr 08:43, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 05:33:22PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > On 04 Apr 15:08, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > After removal FPGA TLS, we can remove tls->ktls indirection too,
> > > > as it is the same thing.
>
> [...]
>
> > > rename drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/{tls_stats.c => ktls_stats.c} (76%)
> > >
> > > Why not ktls_*.c => tls_*.c ?
> >
> > Mostly because other drivers use _ktls_ name for this type of functionality.
> > Plus internally, Tariq suggested to squash everything into ktls.
> >
> > >
> > > Since we now have one TLS implementation, it would've been easier to maybe
> > > repurpose TLS to be KTLS only and avoid renaming every TLS to KTLS in all
> > > functions and files.
> > >
> > > So just keep tls.c and all mlx5_tls_xyz functions and implement ktls
> > > directly in them, the renaming will be done only on the ktls implementation
> > > part of the code rather than in every caller.
> >
> > Should I do it or keep this patch as is?
> >
>
> Keep it, i don't have any strong feeling about this,
> I just wanted to reduce the patch size.
Thanks for the review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-04 12:08 [PATCH mlx5-next 0/5] Drop Mellanox FPGA TLS support from the kernel Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 1/5] net/mlx5_fpga: Drop INNOVA TLS support Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 2/5] net/mlx5: Reliably return TLS device capabilities Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 3/5] net/mlx5: Remove indirection in TLS build Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 4/5] net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 0:33 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-05 5:43 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 17:20 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-05 18:32 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/5] net/mlx5: Cleanup kTLS function names and their exposure Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 0:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 0/5] Drop Mellanox FPGA TLS support from the kernel Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-06 7:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkyLR+VBb81npXnC@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.