From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:24:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlQeEC41m3UeOeiE@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecd8609b-2c52-5fb8-7820-191559d76011@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:49:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 4/11/22 3:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > SPDX
> > > *.h use /* */ style comments
> > >
> > > For double words, remove
> > > with, also
> > >
> > > Spelling replacements
> > > wayt to way
> > > wakup to wakeup
> > > Contrl to Control
> > > cheks to checks
> > > initiaization to initialization
> > > dyanmic to dynamic
> > Something really wrong with indentation above.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h | 2 +-
> > I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
> > OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
> > change. So, it's up to maintainers then.
>
> Yes, whatever folks want. I can split these.
>
> I have been cleaning up the comments in other areas and am trying to strike
> a balance between too big of a patch vs peppering with many single changes.
Patch series are much easier to review and is just as simple to apply as
a single patch, so that makes it overall better for you to do.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
balbi@kernel.org, joel@jms.id.au, andrew@aj.id.au,
nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@microchip.com, alcooperx@gmail.com,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, cai.huoqing@linux.dev,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, neal_liu@aspeedtech.com,
miles.chen@mediatek.com, balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com,
macpaul.lin@mediatek.com, s.shtylyov@omp.ru,
jakobkoschel@gmail.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
quic_wcheng@quicinc.com, yashsri421@gmail.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-geode@lists.infradead.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:24:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlQeEC41m3UeOeiE@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecd8609b-2c52-5fb8-7820-191559d76011@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:49:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 4/11/22 3:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > SPDX
> > > *.h use /* */ style comments
> > >
> > > For double words, remove
> > > with, also
> > >
> > > Spelling replacements
> > > wayt to way
> > > wakup to wakeup
> > > Contrl to Control
> > > cheks to checks
> > > initiaization to initialization
> > > dyanmic to dynamic
> > Something really wrong with indentation above.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h | 2 +-
> > I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
> > OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
> > change. So, it's up to maintainers then.
>
> Yes, whatever folks want. I can split these.
>
> I have been cleaning up the comments in other areas and am trying to strike
> a balance between too big of a patch vs peppering with many single changes.
Patch series are much easier to review and is just as simple to apply as
a single patch, so that makes it overall better for you to do.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
alcooperx@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
macpaul.lin@mediatek.com, yashsri421@gmail.com,
balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, joel@jms.id.au,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-geode@lists.infradead.org, christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
jakobkoschel@gmail.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, balbi@kernel.org,
s.shtylyov@omp.ru, andrew@aj.id.au, neal_liu@aspeedtech.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, quic_wcheng@quicinc.com,
miles.chen@mediatek.com, cai.huoqing@linux.dev,
claudiu.beznea@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:24:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlQeEC41m3UeOeiE@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecd8609b-2c52-5fb8-7820-191559d76011@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 04:49:00AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 4/11/22 3:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> > > SPDX
> > > *.h use /* */ style comments
> > >
> > > For double words, remove
> > > with, also
> > >
> > > Spelling replacements
> > > wayt to way
> > > wakup to wakeup
> > > Contrl to Control
> > > cheks to checks
> > > initiaization to initialization
> > > dyanmic to dynamic
> > Something really wrong with indentation above.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 4 ++--
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h | 2 +-
> > I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
> > OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
> > change. So, it's up to maintainers then.
>
> Yes, whatever folks want. I can split these.
>
> I have been cleaning up the comments in other areas and am trying to strike
> a balance between too big of a patch vs peppering with many single changes.
Patch series are much easier to review and is just as simple to apply as
a single patch, so that makes it overall better for you to do.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-10 15:08 [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments Tom Rix
2022-04-10 15:08 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-10 15:08 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-10 15:18 ` Greg KH
2022-04-10 15:18 ` Greg KH
2022-04-10 15:18 ` Greg KH
2022-04-11 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-11 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-11 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-04-11 11:49 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-11 11:49 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-11 11:49 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-11 12:24 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-04-11 12:24 ` Greg KH
2022-04-11 12:24 ` Greg KH
2022-04-11 12:54 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-11 12:54 ` Tom Rix
2022-04-11 12:54 ` Tom Rix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlQeEC41m3UeOeiE@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.