From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Rebased for 5.15,5.16,5.17] static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:04:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlRfgBe7AeAyoLlr@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155efe38aa611a362ed23a52cecc26371399ae7f.1649696042.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:54:43PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This is backport to 5.15,5.16,5.17
>
> (cherry picked from commit 8fd4ddda2f49a66bf5dd3d0c01966c4b1971308b)
>
> System.map shows that vmlinux contains several instances of
> __static_call_return0():
>
> c0004fc0 t __static_call_return0
> c0011518 t __static_call_return0
> c00d8160 t __static_call_return0
>
> arch_static_call_transform() uses the middle one to check whether we are
> setting a call to __static_call_return0 or not:
>
> c0011520 <arch_static_call_transform>:
> c0011520: 3d 20 c0 01 lis r9,-16383 <== r9 = 0xc001 << 16
> c0011524: 39 29 15 18 addi r9,r9,5400 <== r9 += 0x1518
> c0011528: 7c 05 48 00 cmpw r5,r9 <== r9 has value 0xc0011518 here
>
> So if static_call_update() is called with one of the other instances of
> __static_call_return0(), arch_static_call_transform() won't recognise it.
>
> In order to work properly, global single instance of __static_call_return0() is required.
>
> Fixes: 3f2a8fc4b15d ("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/30821468a0e7d28251954b578e5051dc09300d04.1647258493.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
> ---
> include/linux/static_call.h | 5 +-
> kernel/Makefile | 3 +-
> kernel/static_call.c | 542 +-----------------
> .../{static_call.c => static_call_inline.c} | 5 -
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 551 deletions(-)
> copy kernel/{static_call.c => static_call_inline.c} (99%)
Thanks for this, now queued up!
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-11 16:54 [PATCH] [Rebased for 5.15,5.16,5.17] static_call: Don't make __static_call_return0 static Christophe Leroy
2022-04-11 17:04 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlRfgBe7AeAyoLlr@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.