From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@gmail.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] staging: r8188eu: don't set _SUCCESS again
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:38:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlWA5XkVDd9UJ81v@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411183918.4mw5x6tatslii7mg@viti.kaiser.cx>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:39:18PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Thus wrote Dan Carpenter (dan.carpenter@oracle.com):
>
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 05:15:51PM +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > > ret is initialized to _SUCCESS, there's no need to set it again.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
>
> > I liked the original code better. Otherwise you wonder, is it
> > intentional to return success on this path.
>
> You're right. The original code is easier to understand. It's not
> obvious that this check should return _SUCCESS and the remaining ones
> return _FAIL.
>
> Greg, could you drop this patch or should I resend the series without
> this patch?
Please resend without this one.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-09 15:15 [PATCH 0/8] staging: r8188eu: clean up rtw_pwr_wakeup Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] staging: r8188eu: simplify delay conditions in rtw_pwr_wakeup Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] staging: r8188eu: don't set _SUCCESS again Martin Kaiser
2022-04-11 10:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-11 18:39 ` Martin Kaiser
2022-04-12 5:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-04-12 13:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] staging: r8188eu: make return values consistent Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] staging: r8188eu: simplify the ps_processing check Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] staging: r8188eu: summarize two if statements Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] staging: r8188eu: use kernel functions for timeout handling Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] staging: r8188eu: clean up the code to set ips_deny_time Martin Kaiser
2022-04-09 15:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] staging: r8188eu: remove the bInSuspend loop Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] staging: r8188eu: clean up rtw_pwr_wakeup Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] staging: r8188eu: simplify delay conditions in rtw_pwr_wakeup Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] staging: r8188eu: make return values consistent Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] staging: r8188eu: simplify the ps_processing check Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] staging: r8188eu: summarize two if statements Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] staging: r8188eu: use kernel functions for timeout handling Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] staging: r8188eu: clean up the code to set ips_deny_time Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] staging: r8188eu: remove the bInSuspend loop Martin Kaiser
2022-04-13 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] staging: r8188eu: remove unused timer functions Martin Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlWA5XkVDd9UJ81v@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.