From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com,
marcorr@google.com, zxwang42@gmail.com, erdemaktas@google.com,
rientjes@google.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, bp@suse.de
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/10] x86: desc: Split IDT entry setup into a generic helper
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 16:35:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ylb7tpWVIBcAFrw0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412173407.13637-4-varad.gautam@suse.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022, Varad Gautam wrote:
> EFI bootstrapping code configures a call gate in a later commit to jump
> from 16-bit to 32-bit code.
>
> Introduce a set_idt_entry_t() routine which can be used to fill both
> an interrupt descriptor and a call gate descriptor on x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
> ---
> lib/x86/desc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
> lib/x86/desc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.c b/lib/x86/desc.c
> index 087e85c..049adeb 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.c
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.c
> @@ -57,22 +57,38 @@ __attribute__((regparm(1)))
> #endif
> void do_handle_exception(struct ex_regs *regs);
>
> -void set_idt_entry(int vec, void *addr, int dpl)
> +/*
> + * Fill an idt_entry_t, clearing e_sz bytes first.
> + *
> + * This can also be used to set up x86 call gates, since the gate
> + * descriptor layout is identical to idt_entry_t, except for the
> + * absence of .offset2 and .reserved fields. To do so, pass in e_sz
> + * according to the gate descriptor size.
> + */
> +void set_idt_entry_t(idt_entry_t *e, size_t e_sz, void *addr,
> + u16 sel, u16 type, u16 dpl)
The usage in patch 7, "Transition APs from 16-bit to 32-bit mode" is really confusing
because it's calling an IDT helper to setup the GDT. Also, the "_t" postfix usually
indicates a typedef, not a function
Rather than set_idt_entry_t, maybe set_oversized_desc_entry()? That's not very good
either, but it's at least not outright confusing. Definitely open to other suggestions...
> {
> - idt_entry_t *e = &boot_idt[vec];
> - memset(e, 0, sizeof *e);
> + memset(e, 0, e_sz);
> e->offset0 = (unsigned long)addr;
> - e->selector = read_cs();
> + e->selector = sel;
> e->ist = 0;
> - e->type = 14;
> + e->type = type;
> e->dpl = dpl;
> e->p = 1;
> e->offset1 = (unsigned long)addr >> 16;
> #ifdef __x86_64__
> - e->offset2 = (unsigned long)addr >> 32;
> + if (e_sz == sizeof(*e)) {
> + e->offset2 = (unsigned long)addr >> 32;
> + }
> #endif
> }
>
> +void set_idt_entry(int vec, void *addr, int dpl)
> +{
> + idt_entry_t *e = &boot_idt[vec];
> + set_idt_entry_t(e, sizeof *e, addr, read_cs(), 14, dpl);
> +}
> +
> void set_idt_dpl(int vec, u16 dpl)
> {
> idt_entry_t *e = &boot_idt[vec];
> diff --git a/lib/x86/desc.h b/lib/x86/desc.h
> index 3044409..ae0928f 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/desc.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/desc.h
> @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ unsigned exception_vector(void);
> int write_cr4_checking(unsigned long val);
> unsigned exception_error_code(void);
> bool exception_rflags_rf(void);
> +void set_idt_entry_t(idt_entry_t *e, size_t e_sz, void *addr, u16 sel, u16 type, u16 dpl);
> void set_idt_entry(int vec, void *addr, int dpl);
> void set_idt_sel(int vec, u16 sel);
> void set_idt_dpl(int vec, u16 dpl);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 17:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/10] SMP Support for x86 UEFI Tests Varad Gautam
2022-04-12 17:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Move ap_init() to smp.c Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 15:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 18:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 19:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 19:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 02/10] x86: Move load_idt() to desc.c Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 03/10] x86: desc: Split IDT entry setup into a generic helper Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 16:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 04/10] x86: Move load_gdt_tss() to desc.c Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 15:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 05/10] x86: efi: Stop using UEFI-provided stack Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 06/10] x86: efi: Stop using UEFI-provided %gs for percpu storage Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 16:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 07/10] x86: efi, smp: Transition APs from 16-bit to 32-bit mode Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 19:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 08/10] x86: Move 32-bit bringup routines to start32.S Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 19:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 09/10] x86: efi, smp: Transition APs from 32-bit to 64-bit mode Varad Gautam
2022-04-12 17:34 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 10/10] x86: Provide a common 64-bit AP entrypoint for EFI and non-EFI Varad Gautam
2022-04-13 19:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-13 19:57 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/10] SMP Support for x86 UEFI Tests Sean Christopherson
2022-04-26 11:51 ` Varad Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ylb7tpWVIBcAFrw0@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcorr@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=varad.gautam@suse.com \
--cc=zxwang42@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.