From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32E8C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236E01777; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:39:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 236E01777 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1650998391; bh=Um7tQN5c/khfGtLAMRRk2f7fw77MXm+xGDs/7GBcITU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=BcX9fwOvQCAZN3RBH+SQXGnjgX0JKzDWEcLiMJ6ODju6BADWkN7XXyiGjNPcCwfhP hoel+Qva14p0Z9t4w2ewLndAIrwg6dLzE4mLckExVdHNDsYwWYx6qInkVHQeu+DXKo dNs+Ua2znx+14WcywFG7CcNmEyY03Av6mJrxJw8g= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609F8F80171; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 7E01BF8025C; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:38:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E5C2F801D5 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:38:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 1E5C2F801D5 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PpyFMGRr" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB216175E; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 796F2C385A0; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:38:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1650998306; bh=Um7tQN5c/khfGtLAMRRk2f7fw77MXm+xGDs/7GBcITU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PpyFMGRr0lLGB4hzkOej9/PkVWZKiNLVIbzHe9FUyUTK0k4bC+3U+0d94u2K8Ib13 /sjyJPOf0xTfZW+zhck5cQzsxjUb9eP8h9Jy/o7HjA+KZGmhF7NQViAiX5aAFL8Q+s LSOLTyPUwS9D7g70x2mrQc840tY07WDUUGHcH4gOa/0qLBtimqHHpYPy5e13SvQ1MK dSv1gkehNp8xDmamyYnkxbJBvawjcPCXDTUAbX5Bz+vSybJ+yzYctgl1AhCbkFNUVT /vVVQ+0Iw4XPPxSeguiCK+07gEKgTDySTgsYVXfcyJ2Cw1WuXQ6j7X80mdFaHgPmUC HN8HoIWKqdKEw== Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:38:21 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: avs: Depend on CONFIG_ACPI Message-ID: References: <20220426115454.685787-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com> <726c58e5-241d-053f-8b4c-d56a5a228f0f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3viuR44h1HFYANFi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: I'm a Lisp variable -- bind me! Cc: Cezary Rojewski , kernel test robot , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Takashi Iwai , Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?U8WCYXdpxYRza2k=?= X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --3viuR44h1HFYANFi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:26:08PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > my suggestion was the following: > depends on PCI > depends on COMMON_CLK > select SND_SOC_ACPI if ACPI The X86 || COMPILE_TEST that's there currently is also sensible given that this can only actually be used on x86 hardware. --3viuR44h1HFYANFi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmJoPBwACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CNjgf/XqRTecOdKhkhLCjuy/k5IagI1kGOEQTdmLP8SFPogsMkHx0gbKk1EDX9 TfWlUijf/2IlxZSksmhinw5a4JDmt+ErmCkZVK6V2weEMOeDZ+FaE8JnC1izYsZw QrY4OjDj18O2YFYRyyb6JoggJXcnRmaHO34e6KqBj/EXU3BP9anGl7M5azJn0cM8 a65+YPQR/0LENY2E7N0WxRxJBooRy9Ri2uividUCwXJf0OLrZAzOr36w4f45Fj+5 EROj3e1qttmH+D8GlefdF/kkwyObzHCRw5G39GG9KWM3l4IU9mL1dQOESNZqFXaA FUSg14RqpLfQLT18zIz+UkteVulSCA== =dnAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3viuR44h1HFYANFi--