From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Thiébaud Weksteen" <tweek@google.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Alistair Delva <adelva@google.com>,
Adam Shih <adamshih@google.com>,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_loader: use kernel credentials when reading firmware
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmpQOSf0bdOcIZSU@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220428061707.768468-1-tweek@google.com>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 04:17:07PM +1000, Thiébaud Weksteen wrote:
> Device drivers may decide to not load firmware when probed to avoid
> slowing down the boot process should the firmware filesystem not be
> available yet. In this case, the firmware loading request may be done
> when a device file associated with the driver is first accessed. The
> credentials of the userspace process accessing the device file may be
> used to validate access to the firmware files requested by the driver.
> Ensure that the kernel assumes the responsibility of reading the
> firmware.
>
> This was observed on Android for a graphic driver loading their firmware
> when the device file (e.g. /dev/mali0) was first opened by userspace
> (i.e. surfaceflinger). The security context of surfaceflinger was used
> to validate the access to the firmware file (e.g.
> /vendor/firmware/mali.bin).
>
> Previously, Android configurations were not setting up the
> firmware_class.path command line argument and were relying on the
> userspace fallback mechanism. In this case, the security context of the
> userspace daemon (i.e. ueventd) was consistently used to read firmware
> files. More Android devices are now found to set firmware_class.path
> which gives the kernel the opportunity to read the firmware directly
> (via kernel_read_file_from_path_initns). In this scenario, the current
> process credentials were used, even if unrelated to the loading of the
> firmware file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@google.com>
> ---
As stated before, should this go to stable kernels? If so, how far
back?
And you forgot to cc: John?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-28 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-28 6:17 [PATCH v3] firmware_loader: use kernel credentials when reading firmware Thiébaud Weksteen
2022-04-28 8:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-04-29 4:54 ` Thiébaud Weksteen
2022-04-29 6:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmpQOSf0bdOcIZSU@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adamshih@google.com \
--cc=adelva@google.com \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tweek@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.