From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: detect self referencing btree sibling pointers
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 07:53:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnFB+Ff+gRh0vQbb@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220502082018.1076561-2-david@fromorbit.com>
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
One nit (with a few instances):
> + if (level >= 0) {
> + if (!xfs_btree_check_lptr(cur, sibling, level + 1))
> + return __this_address;
> + } else if (!xfs_verify_fsbno(mp, sibling)) {
> + return __this_address;
> + }
Maybe it's just me, but I would find the non-condensed version a little
easier to read for these kinds of checks:
if (level >= 0) {
if (!xfs_btree_check_lptr(cur, sibling, level + 1))
return __this_address;
} else {
if (!xfs_verify_fsbno(mp, sibling))
return __this_address;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-03 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-02 8:20 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: fix random format verification issues Dave Chinner
2022-05-02 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: detect self referencing btree sibling pointers Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-03 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-03 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-06 9:22 ` [xfs] 32678f1513: aim7.jobs-per-min -5.6% regression kernel test robot
2022-05-06 9:22 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-06 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-06 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-07 11:09 ` [LKP] " Carel Si
2022-05-07 11:09 ` Carel Si
2022-05-09 0:03 ` [LKP] " Dave Chinner
2022-05-09 0:03 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-02 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: validate inode fork size against fork format Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 22:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-02 8:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: set XFS_FEAT_NLINK correctly Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 22:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-02 8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: validate v5 feature fields Dave Chinner
2022-05-02 9:44 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-02 12:37 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-03 15:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 22:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2022-05-03 23:18 ` Dave Chinner
2022-05-03 23:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnFB+Ff+gRh0vQbb@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.