From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF2DC433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230456AbiEIXsG (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 19:48:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233955AbiEIXqc (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 19:46:32 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36745266057; Mon, 9 May 2022 16:36:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414C161301; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65899C385C3; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:36:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652139369; bh=q2Anzy7Vn7+KTWoXEccZSkJLiAE4Av2Zp9ltchMZy8U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZqIVr/lAHT4J6IYo+xFJTjXJnf9ROi3nTQkIEu8M2R6xb3HrXFtq/slugDTE52hj5 R8IB7UOM/OSqknz40bEA1Mo7YnlRMaqmFuPZrF+hgizcHcbiU1VqKOeZuW0GeuIeqW 2L/Z1khugBcEf3jZrqceyJ1WxJZ1FV9TJf9ssyRDfFO6eLdeISgmH4d55AImOoME08 AhUuGgpjtKP4SMgmP5ibBMtIDIXp/uvuiuKGTxLUNUuuRTh+C6gbRqulXJ+aQt4sT8 pUvy5ATNPDxAnbL2iCjlqcgC0VCKqjlmNxL8E1QzJ8EtK0/IxrL97JPtfLJrfH0MBM zayNYphe6CUlg== Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:36:07 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jeff Layton , Lukas Czerner , Theodore Ts'o , Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups Message-ID: References: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:08:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > This series cleans up and fixes the way that ext4 and f2fs handle the > test_dummy_encryption mount option: > > - Patches 1-2 make test_dummy_encryption consistently require that the > 'encrypt' feature flag already be enabled and that > CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION be enabled. Note, this will cause xfstest > ext4/053 to start failing; my xfstests patch "ext4/053: update the > test_dummy_encryption tests" will fix that. > > - Patches 3-7 replace the fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() helper > function with new functions that work properly with the new mount API, > by splitting up the parsing, checking, and applying steps. These fix > bugs that were introduced when ext4 started using the new mount API. > > We can either take all these patches through the fscrypt tree, or we can > take them in multiple cycles as follows: > > 1. patch 1 via ext4, patch 2 via f2fs, patch 3-4 via fscrypt > 2. patch 5 via ext4, patch 6 via f2fs > 3. patch 7 via fscrypt > > Ted and Jaegeuk, let me know what you prefer. > > Changed v1 => v2: > - Added patches 2-7 > - Also reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > Eric Biggers (7): > ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported > f2fs: reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_policy_to_key_spec() > fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption > ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API > f2fs: use the updated test_dummy_encryption helper functions > fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() Since I haven't heard from anyone, I've gone ahead and applied patches 3-4 to fscrypt#master for 5.19, so that the filesystem-specific patches can be taken in 5.20. But patches 1-2 could still be applied now. Any feedback on this series would be greatly appreciated! - Eric From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212CDC433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1noCvN-0007ys-QB; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:36:22 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1noCvN-0007ym-1O for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:36:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kJUYa9pwc9tHwIPb4szCCAz7gxbf4ZzScOjejq7qdao=; b=WyK9T0Gtuy6cwtIfBmiFnOlAHF D/vKwUfslvQvlwt4NzZvrdEFI9Nf6oJelfio0rfSeGZlWhNfjxBMjyd3BFtrr7sQgp0HMUyHQG+7Z RWXcEqi/EjqIGWyBNfGz6VqRJGE0sFpczgWm3bIGDHmJw8e8LgpHAG5AVVw1xxvBHHMk=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kJUYa9pwc9tHwIPb4szCCAz7gxbf4ZzScOjejq7qdao=; b=dk56GPhYwOh5WoFQy3PG5dUzD6 qDnretZ+C1i6fLLHvk9bPqlA2JZp10sGAIlTvp7Wmey3sX3Ju6MHvNBOHeHmlZgWyEg1sgtwRzi6+ Fr3VNyV2m0wKqEiNkJpftxD2PuMYR3HPzQH54FOVd+9qRlmqUAAxr6wrRffZtpmZ+8Gw=; Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.94.2) id 1noCvL-006oKB-JM for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 09 May 2022 23:36:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEC7612EC; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65899C385C3; Mon, 9 May 2022 23:36:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652139369; bh=q2Anzy7Vn7+KTWoXEccZSkJLiAE4Av2Zp9ltchMZy8U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZqIVr/lAHT4J6IYo+xFJTjXJnf9ROi3nTQkIEu8M2R6xb3HrXFtq/slugDTE52hj5 R8IB7UOM/OSqknz40bEA1Mo7YnlRMaqmFuPZrF+hgizcHcbiU1VqKOeZuW0GeuIeqW 2L/Z1khugBcEf3jZrqceyJ1WxJZ1FV9TJf9ssyRDfFO6eLdeISgmH4d55AImOoME08 AhUuGgpjtKP4SMgmP5ibBMtIDIXp/uvuiuKGTxLUNUuuRTh+C6gbRqulXJ+aQt4sT8 pUvy5ATNPDxAnbL2iCjlqcgC0VCKqjlmNxL8E1QzJ8EtK0/IxrL97JPtfLJrfH0MBM zayNYphe6CUlg== Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 16:36:07 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: References: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220501050857.538984-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Headers-End: 1noCvL-006oKB-JM Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] test_dummy_encryption fixes and cleanups X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lukas Czerner , Jeff Layton , Theodore Ts'o , Jaegeuk Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 10:08:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > This series cleans up and fixes the way that ext4 and f2fs handle the > test_dummy_encryption mount option: > > - Patches 1-2 make test_dummy_encryption consistently require that the > 'encrypt' feature flag already be enabled and that > CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION be enabled. Note, this will cause xfstest > ext4/053 to start failing; my xfstests patch "ext4/053: update the > test_dummy_encryption tests" will fix that. > > - Patches 3-7 replace the fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() helper > function with new functions that work properly with the new mount API, > by splitting up the parsing, checking, and applying steps. These fix > bugs that were introduced when ext4 started using the new mount API. > > We can either take all these patches through the fscrypt tree, or we can > take them in multiple cycles as follows: > > 1. patch 1 via ext4, patch 2 via f2fs, patch 3-4 via fscrypt > 2. patch 5 via ext4, patch 6 via f2fs > 3. patch 7 via fscrypt > > Ted and Jaegeuk, let me know what you prefer. > > Changed v1 => v2: > - Added patches 2-7 > - Also reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > > Eric Biggers (7): > ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when supported > f2fs: reject test_dummy_encryption when !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION > fscrypt: factor out fscrypt_policy_to_key_spec() > fscrypt: add new helper functions for test_dummy_encryption > ext4: fix up test_dummy_encryption handling for new mount API > f2fs: use the updated test_dummy_encryption helper functions > fscrypt: remove fscrypt_set_test_dummy_encryption() Since I haven't heard from anyone, I've gone ahead and applied patches 3-4 to fscrypt#master for 5.19, so that the filesystem-specific patches can be taken in 5.20. But patches 1-2 could still be applied now. Any feedback on this series would be greatly appreciated! - Eric _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel