From: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/smc: align the connect behaviour with TCP
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 21:32:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ynu63ZIz433CYBtb@TonyMac-Alibaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b380e302-5b16-2de0-eca0-9805359daaaa@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:58:38PM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/5/10 17:30, Tony Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:58:37PM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote:
> >> Connect with O_NONBLOCK will not be completed immediately
> >> and returns -EINPROGRESS. It is possible to use selector/poll
> >> for completion by selecting the socket for writing. After select
> >> indicates writability, a second connect function call will return
> >> 0 to indicate connected successfully as TCP does, but smc returns
> >
> > If the connection is established successfully, the following up call of
> > connect() returns -EISCONN (SS_CONNECTED), which is expected and SMC
> > does it, same as TCP.
> >
> > In case of misunderstanding, could you append more detailed information?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tony Lu
> >
>
> io_uring uses nonblocking connect as follow steps:
> 1) call connect with nonblocking
> 2) wait for selector/poll to indicate writability
> 3) call connect to confirm connection's state
>
> In the third step, tcp changes the socket state from SS_CONNECTING to
> SS_CONNECTED and returns 0 if the connection is established successfully,
> but smc returns -EISCONN.
Based on the steps you list, I am wondering if it is finished in the
step #1, the call of connect() in step #3 would return -EISCONN. Should
we check 0 and -EISCONN in step #3?
To fix this issue, I think we should be careful about adding and
handling sock state, maybe we could push it to net-next and take
advantage of sock state. And I will test this patch later in our test
cases.
Thanks,
Tony Lu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-09 11:58 [PATCH net 0/2] net/smc: two fixes for using smc with io_uring Guangguan Wang
2022-05-09 11:58 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net/smc: non blocking recvmsg() return -EAGAIN when no data and signal_pending Guangguan Wang
2022-05-10 3:23 ` Tony Lu
2022-05-09 11:58 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net/smc: align the connect behaviour with TCP Guangguan Wang
2022-05-10 9:30 ` Tony Lu
2022-05-10 12:58 ` Guangguan Wang
2022-05-11 13:32 ` Tony Lu [this message]
2022-05-10 11:05 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-05-10 13:03 ` Guangguan Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ynu63ZIz433CYBtb@TonyMac-Alibaba \
--to=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.