From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann <stefan.mahnke-hartmann@infineon.com>
Cc: Marten.Lindahl@axis.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
johannes.holland@infineon.com, jsnitsel@redhat.com,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martenli@axis.com, nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Fix buffer access in tpm2_get_tpm_pt()
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 18:11:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnvSG0hfjqEe92v6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220509114809.245621-1-stefan.mahnke-hartmann@infineon.com>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 01:48:09PM +0200, Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann wrote:
> On 07.05.22 21:43, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 02:31:46PM +0200, Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann wrote:
> >> Under certain conditions uninitialized memory will be accessed.
> >> As described by TCG Trusted Platform Module Library Specification,
> >> rev. 1.59 (Part 3: Commands), if a TPM2_GetCapability is received,
> >> requesting a capability, the TPM in Field Upgrade mode may return a
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Looks like random picks for casing: two words with upper case letter and
> > one with lowe case.
>
> In the TCG specification it is unfortunately also inconsistent.
> I will change it to lower case then.
>
> >
> >> zero length list.
> >> Check the property count in tpm2_get_tpm_pt().
> >>
> >> Fixes: 2ab3241161b3 ("tpm: migrate tpm2_get_tpm_pt() to use struct tpm_buf")
> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann <stefan.mahnke-hartmann@infineon.com>
> >
> > Which section is this in that specification documented?
>
> It is described in the TCG Trusted Platform Module Library Specification,
> rev. 1.59 (Part 3: Commands) in Chapter 30.2.1, Example 3. This example
> describes the behavior in failure mode, but it may occur in other
> circumstances, such as field upgrade mode.
>
> >
> > I looked into section 30.2 but could not find the part that documents this
> > behaviour, i.e. returning success in FW upgrade mode. Why it wouldn't just
> > return TPM_RC_UPGRADE?
>
> Since some computer system failed booting up in case the TPM returned
> anything else than SUCCESS, therefore Infineon decided to return SUCCESS
> when TPM is in field upgrade mode.
OK, fair enough. This would be a place for inline comment though, given
that it is not obvious by intuition.
BR, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 12:31 [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Fix buffer access in tpm2_get_tpm_pt() Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann
2022-05-06 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: Add Field Upgrade mode support for Infineon TPM2 modules Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann
2022-05-07 19:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-09 12:50 ` Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann
2022-05-11 15:12 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-07 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Fix buffer access in tpm2_get_tpm_pt() Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-05-09 11:48 ` Stefan Mahnke-Hartmann
2022-05-11 15:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnvSG0hfjqEe92v6@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=Marten.Lindahl@axis.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=johannes.holland@infineon.com \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martenli@axis.com \
--cc=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.mahnke-hartmann@infineon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.