From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D544C433FE for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqXFI-00041S-Ub for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 05:42:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqXDS-0002w2-Kh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 05:40:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:42531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqXDO-0004fm-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 05:40:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1652694025; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=kuLJY7n4maaNPAnooAPFwwZdVJ04iHwTDo3YZJ3WRWE=; b=HWFtnoEb+Vz0uaUSdOzQ/s1TMUG+sSYY2o6BtW33XicpP7O5f8o7FVboU9oUOlE3N+U2rn oxaXApUUiijDmyD8GCVVoYH5lgVs/++jjPqo+KOkmmU7pRWzobzhOhfNZgTMleEspZh5kn 7kzWllKh7Dh8+k4umaaLGhas7PUXfWc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-278-_AgQjtyMOWyZc4yYBGeyCg-1; Mon, 16 May 2022 05:40:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _AgQjtyMOWyZc4yYBGeyCg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6781833966 for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.33.36.123]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C63400E884; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:40:15 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Leonardo Bras Soares Passos , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-devel , Juan Quintela , Peter Xu Subject: Re: [PULL 00/16] migration queue Message-ID: References: <20220510083355.92738-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.1 (2022-02-19) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:51:12AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:40:07AM -0300, Leonardo Bras Soares Passos wrote: > > From a previous thread: > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:20 PM Dr. David Alan Gilbert > > wrote: > > > > > > Leo: > > > Unfortunately this is failing a couple of CI tests; the MSG_ZEROCOPY > > > one I guess is the simpler one; I think Stefanha managed to find the > > > liburing fix for the __kernel_timespec case, but that looks like a bit > > > more fun! > > > > > > Dave > > > > I thought Stefanha had fixed this bug, and we were just waiting for a > > new alpine rootfs/image with that fixed. > > Is that correct? > > I didn't fix the liburing __kernel_timespec issue on alpine Linux. It's > probably a packaging bug and I gave Dave the email address of the > package maintainer. I'm not sure if the package maintainer has been > contacted or released a fixed liburing package. It was prety easy to bisect the problem with liburing so I filed a bug pointing to the fix needed: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/issues/13813 With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|