All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 18:15:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoLM5caUPbkJ7DEy@xz-m1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220429183935.1094599-8-dmatlack@google.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 06:39:33PM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> The linker does obey strong/weak symbols when linking static libraries,
> it simply resolves an undefined symbol to the first-encountered symbol.
> This means that defining __weak arch-generic functions and then defining
> arch-specific strong functions to override them in libkvm will not
> always work.
> 
> More specifically, if we have:
> 
> lib/generic.c:
> 
>   void __weak foo(void)
>   {
>           pr_info("weak\n");
>   }
> 
>   void bar(void)
>   {
>           foo();
>   }
> 
> lib/x86_64/arch.c:
> 
>   void foo(void)
>   {
>           pr_info("strong\n");
>   }
> 
> And a selftest that calls bar(), it will print "weak". Now if you make
> generic.o explicitly depend on arch.o (e.g. add function to arch.c that
> is called directly from generic.c) it will print "strong". In other
> words, it seems that the linker is free to throw out arch.o when linking
> because generic.o does not explicitly depend on it, which causes the
> linker to lose the strong symbol.
> 
> One solution is to link libkvm.a with --whole-archive so that the linker
> doesn't throw away object files it thinks are unnecessary. However that
> is a bit difficult to plumb since we are using the common selftests
> makefile rules. An easier solution is to drop libkvm.a just link
> selftests with all the .o files that were originally in libkvm.a.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> index af582d168621..c1eb6acb30de 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -172,12 +172,13 @@ LDFLAGS += -pthread $(no-pie-option) $(pgste-option)
>  # $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) starts with $(OUTPUT)/
>  include ../lib.mk
>  
> -STATIC_LIBS := $(OUTPUT)/libkvm.a
>  LIBKVM_C := $(filter %.c,$(LIBKVM))
>  LIBKVM_S := $(filter %.S,$(LIBKVM))
>  LIBKVM_C_OBJ := $(patsubst %.c, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_C))
>  LIBKVM_S_OBJ := $(patsubst %.S, $(OUTPUT)/%.o, $(LIBKVM_S))
> -EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ) $(STATIC_LIBS) cscope.*
> +LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)
> +
> +EXTRA_CLEAN += $(LIBKVM_OBJS) cscope.*
>  
>  x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ))))
>  $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
> @@ -186,13 +187,9 @@ $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
>  $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ): $(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.S
>  	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(TARGET_ARCH) -c $< -o $@
>  
> -LIBKVM_OBJS = $(LIBKVM_C_OBJ) $(LIBKVM_S_OBJ)
> -$(OUTPUT)/libkvm.a: $(LIBKVM_OBJS)
> -	$(AR) crs $@ $^
> -
>  x := $(shell mkdir -p $(sort $(dir $(TEST_GEN_PROGS))))
> -all: $(STATIC_LIBS)
> -$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): $(STATIC_LIBS)
> +all: $(LIBKVM_OBJS)

Can this line be dropped alongside?  Default targets should have already
been set in ../lib.mk anyway iiuc, and they all depend on the objs.

> +$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): $(LIBKVM_OBJS)

Never know such a difference, but it does seem true to happen..  Good to
learn this.

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-16 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 18:39 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: selftests: Add nested support to dirty_log_perf_test David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: selftests: Replace x86_page_size with raw levels David Matlack
2022-05-13 20:04   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to create 2M and 1G EPT mappings David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:38     ` David Matlack
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: selftests: Drop stale function parameter comment for nested_map() David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:32   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: selftests: Refactor nested_map() to specify target level David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:34   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: selftests: Move VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP_AD_BITS to vmx.h David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:12   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to check EPT/VPID capabilities David Matlack
2022-05-16 20:42   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: selftests: Link selftests directly with lib object files David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: selftests: Clean up LIBKVM files in Makefile David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:15   ` Peter Xu
2022-04-29 18:39 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: selftests: Add option to run dirty_log_perf_test vCPUs in L2 David Matlack
2022-05-16 22:17   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 22:34     ` David Matlack
2022-05-16 23:42       ` Peter Xu
2022-05-16 23:47         ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YoLM5caUPbkJ7DEy@xz-m1.local \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.