From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] random: convert to using iters, for Al Viro
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 17:55:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yoe52RaMayvgodVW@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a6ed6b9-0917-0d83-5c45-70ff58fad429@kernel.dk>
Hi Jens,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:44:25AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Ran 32, 1k, 4k here and it does seem to be down aboout 3%. Which is
> definitely bigger than I expected, particularly for larger reads. If
> anything, the 32b read seems comparably better than eg 1k or 4k, which
> is also unexpected. Let me do a bit of profiling to see what is up.
Something to keep in mind wrt 32b is that for complicated crypto
reasons, the function has this logic:
- If len <= 32, generate one 64 byte block and give <= 32 bytes of it to
the caller.
- If len > 32, generate one 64 byte block, but give 0 of it to the
caller. Then generate ⌈len/64⌉ blocks for the caller.
Put together, this means:
- 1..32, 1 block
- 33..64, 2 blocks
- 65..128, 3 blocks
- 129..196, 4 blocks
So you get this sort of shelf where the amortization benefits don't
really kick in until after 3 blocks.
> If you're worried about it, I'd just keep the read/write and add the
> iter variants on the side.
Not a chance of that. These functions are already finicky as-is; I would
really hate to have to duplicate all of these paths.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 9:44 [PATCH v4 0/3] random: convert to using iters, for Al Viro Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] random: convert to using fops->read_iter() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 13:37 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 14:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 15:12 ` Al Viro
2022-05-20 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] random: convert to using fops->write_iter() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 9:44 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] random: wire up fops->splice_{read,write}_iter() Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 12:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] random: convert to using iters, for Al Viro Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:25 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 15:34 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 15:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-05-20 15:58 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 16:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 16:06 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:46 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 15:51 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:58 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 16:00 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 15:47 ` Al Viro
2022-05-20 15:53 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 16:15 ` Al Viro
2022-05-20 16:24 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-20 16:39 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-20 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-24 4:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yoe52RaMayvgodVW@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.