From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Cc: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:40:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoeMW+/KGk8VpbED@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519204017.15586-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:40:17PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Accidentally noticed, that this driver is the only user of
> while (timer_after(jiffies...)).
>
> It looks like typo, because likely this while loop will finish after 1st
> iteration, because time_after() returns true when 1st argument _is after_
> 2nd one.
>
> Fix it by negating time_after return value inside while loops statement
A better fix would be to use one of the helpers in linux/iopoll.h.
There is a second bug in the current code:
static int ocelot_fdma_wait_chan_safe(struct ocelot *ocelot, int chan)
{
unsigned long timeout;
u32 safe;
timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US);
do {
safe = ocelot_fdma_readl(ocelot, MSCC_FDMA_CH_SAFE);
if (safe & BIT(chan))
return 0;
} while (time_after(jiffies, timeout));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
The scheduler could put the thread to sleep, and it does not get woken
up for OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US. During that time, the hardware
has done its thing, but you exit the while loop and return -ETIMEDOUT.
linux/iopoll.h handles this correctly by testing the state one more
time after the timeout has expired.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 20:40 [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-19 23:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-20 8:21 ` Clément Léger
2022-05-20 12:40 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-05-20 21:06 ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-20 21:31 ` [PATCH v2] net: ocelot: fix wrong " Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-21 13:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-21 16:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-23 14:00 ` Clément Léger
2022-05-27 3:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-24 15:14 ` Clément Léger
2022-06-27 14:46 ` Pavel Skripkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoeMW+/KGk8VpbED@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.