diff for duplicates of <YompDXEY1MaHElmE@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 3a28710..7517afd 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 On 05/20/22 at 08:45am, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
-> On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 03:09:09 PDT (-0700), lizhengyu3 at huawei.com wrote:
+> On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 03:09:09 PDT (-0700), lizhengyu3@huawei.com wrote:
 > > From: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
 > > 
 > > When CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE is set for riscv platform, the compilation of
@@ -79,3 +79,9 @@ I ever checked this patch, and thought the renaming of kernel_map in
 arch/riscv might be more reasonable, because 'need_kernel_map' is obviously
 redundant and looks silly, considering in a generic code. But searching
 result of kernel_map under arch/riscv stops me suggesting that.
+
+
+_______________________________________________
+linux-riscv mailing list
+linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 89dfca9..ba0902d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,13 +1,29 @@
  "ref\020220408100914.150110-2-lizhengyu3@huawei.com\0"
  "ref\0mhng-33c63a92-49e5-48a0-8f54-797c797ee373@palmer-mbp2014\0"
  "From\0Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v3 -next 1/6] kexec_file: Fix kexec_file.c build error for riscv platform\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 -next 1/6] kexec_file: Fix kexec_file.c build error for riscv platform\0"
  "Date\0Sun, 22 May 2022 11:07:57 +0800\0"
- "To\0kexec@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0lizhengyu3@huawei.com"
+  liaochang1@huawei.com
+  alex@ghiti.fr
+  aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
+  Bjorn Topel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
+  ebiederm@xmission.com
+  guoren@linux.alibaba.com
+  jszhang@kernel.org
+  kexec@lists.infradead.org
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
+  mick@ics.forth.gr
+  Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
+  penberg@kernel.org
+  sunnanyong@huawei.com
+ " wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 05/20/22 at 08:45am, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:\n"
- "> On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 03:09:09 PDT (-0700), lizhengyu3 at huawei.com wrote:\n"
+ "> On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 03:09:09 PDT (-0700), lizhengyu3@huawei.com wrote:\n"
  "> > From: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > When CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE is set for riscv platform, the compilation of\n"
@@ -86,6 +102,12 @@
  "I ever checked this patch, and thought the renaming of kernel_map in\n"
  "arch/riscv might be more reasonable, because 'need_kernel_map' is obviously\n"
  "redundant and looks silly, considering in a generic code. But searching\n"
- result of kernel_map under arch/riscv stops me suggesting that.
+ "result of kernel_map under arch/riscv stops me suggesting that.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-riscv mailing list\n"
+ "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
 
-16ce6e788f21efd5bc49070e0ccb5957eb983224b5e3fbf636a77f37a67d2559
+dd5f23628fcac4cfd7a5dd40e7e24df83109be17990efe185d459994b7398292
