All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net, phil@philpotter.co.uk,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Fix kernel-doc
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 14:58:56 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yp2zwBqn6uDvGNWN@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yp2WPrOz85/70CZx@kroah.com>

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:53:02AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 04:39:14PM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> > Fix the following W=1 kernel warnings:
> > 
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c:291: warning: expecting
> > prototype for Function(). Prototype was for rtl8188e_PHY_SetRFReg()
> > instead.
> > 
> > drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_phycfg.c:257: warning: expecting
> > prototype for Function(). Prototype was for rtl8188e_PHY_QueryRFReg()
> > instead.
> 
> Please put build warning lines all on one line.
> 
> > 
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> No, gcc reported this, not a robot, right?
> 
> You have read Documentation/process/researcher-guidelines.rst for how to
> properly document patches that are created by research tools like this,
> right?  Please fix this commit up to follow those requirements please.
> 

Hi Greg and Jiapeng,

First, IMO this is not research tool (in the sense of academic purposes),
but development bot used in corporate environment, kinda like kernel
test robot <lkp@intel.com>. When the bot reports any build warnings,
these will be followed up by developers proposing fixes.

What I see in the patch message is just "Fix this warning..." without
saying why there is the warning.

Second, gcc DOESN'T, again DOESN'T, report "expecting prototype"
warnings. These are from scripts/kernel-doc, which enabled these
warnings on W=1 build.

So the underlying problem is mismatching function name in kernel-doc
comment and actual function.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-06  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  8:39 [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Fix kernel-doc Jiapeng Chong
2022-06-06  5:53 ` Greg KH
2022-06-06  7:58   ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2022-06-07 11:00     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yp2zwBqn6uDvGNWN@debian.me \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=abaci@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.