From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EA1C433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344190AbiFGPeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:34:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344221AbiFGPeJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:34:09 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF464C50AC for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 08:34:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mjtQ0zwo1EXIFg/4iIQFnmSTidJQnindZd3Hks1pTtM=; b=U9cfQdtFk71bFP7u2d6DpmZSde EgTGwn5AnK/VC6jSUuE8+kipdNX3nTGwZw5C6yuGiPJleLZNvVFjQzd75yid7wDgDKXXBg1wEUVdA gexa4asOCweF8ED26CqUyok80NvmP0xLg68BpqsarkAthWAwyZidy9SAdH6rb0SMinNOJThnNcep6 eAfrB9+wefqj+vdUhq20kdTSfLNZRx8TqVSaFeVwFhuthvFQ5FCq2d1QacxMqYnepjiX/vD2/fwWH RZwD8v4XKyxXi+YCROkdk6GTd2pQExfkouV/0/cYmhRSrbSgdVZnFaKezgDxz9E3goPTjhuUaOqQ1 298pNUYg==; Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nybDZ-004m4l-Dd; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:34:05 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:34:05 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] iocb: delay evaluation of IS_SYNC(...) until we want to check IOCB_DSYNC Message-ID: References: <20220607103450.qmkgtt2brbzvx4fu@quack3.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220607103450.qmkgtt2brbzvx4fu@quack3.lan> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 07-06-22 04:11:06, Al Viro wrote: > > New helper to be used instead of direct checks for IOCB_DSYNC: > > iocb_is_dsync(iocb). Checks converted, which allows to avoid > > the IS_SYNC(iocb->ki_filp->f_mapping->host) part (4 cache lines) > > from iocb_flags() - it's checked in iocb_is_dsync() instead > > > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > Does it really matter that much when we have io_is_direct() just two lines > above which does: IS_DAX(filp->f_mapping->host)? > > Also presumably even if we got rid of the IS_DAX check, we'll need to do > file->f_mapping->host traversal sooner rather than later anyway so it is > not clear to me how much it helps performance to defer this traversal to a > bit later. ... which would be out of the part of codepath that is shared with e.g. reads and writes on pipes. > Finally it seems a bit error prone to be checking some IOCB_ flags directly > while IOCB_DSYNC needs to be checked with iocb_is_dsync() instead. I think > we'll grow some place mistakenly checking IOCB_DSYNC sooner rather than > later. So maybe at least rename IOCB_DSYNC to __IOCB_DSYNC to make it more > obvious in the name that something unusual is going on? That might make sense...