All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 08:54:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ypa4xrAHUslpQPhN@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220531160535.3444915-1-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The elevator is only used for file system requests, which are stopped in
> del_gendisk.  Move disabling the elevator and freeing the scheduler tags
> to the end of del_gendisk instead of doing that work in disk_release and
> blk_cleanup_queue to avoid a use after free on q->tag_set from
> disk_release as the tag_set might not be alive at that point.
> 
> Move the blk_qos_exit call as well, as it just depends on the elevator
> exit and would be the only reason to keep the not exactly cheap queue
> freeze in disk_release.
> 
> Fixes: e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Tested-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 13 -------------
>  block/genhd.c    | 38 ++++++++++----------------------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 80fa73c419a99..19cfa71e33728 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -322,19 +322,6 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  		blk_mq_exit_queue(q);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * In theory, request pool of sched_tags belongs to request queue.
> -	 * However, the current implementation requires tag_set for freeing
> -	 * requests, so free the pool now.
> -	 *
> -	 * Queue has become frozen, there can't be any in-queue requests, so
> -	 * it is safe to free requests now.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> -	if (q->elevator)
> -		blk_mq_sched_free_rqs(q);
> -	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> -
>  	/* @q is and will stay empty, shutdown and put */
>  	blk_put_queue(q);
>  }
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 8ff5b187791af..9914d0f24fecd 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,16 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
>  
>  	blk_sync_queue(q);
>  	blk_flush_integrity();
> +	blk_mq_cancel_work_sync(q);
> +
> +	if (q->elevator) {
> +		mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> +		elevator_exit(q);
> +		mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> +	}

This way can't be safe, who can guarantee that all sync submission
activities are gone after queue is frozen? We had lots of reports on
blk_mq_sched_has_work() which triggers UAF.

Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 16:05 [PATCH] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  0:54 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-06-01  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  7:09     ` Ming Lei
2022-06-01  7:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  9:07         ` Ming Lei
2022-06-01 12:01           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ypa4xrAHUslpQPhN@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.