All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm/page_alloc: Replace local_lock with normal spinlock
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:05:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yqqd5nHeAT77C4D0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615160446.be1f75fd256d67e57b27a9fc@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 04:04:46PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:48:55 +0200 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> > In the logs I see lots of errors like:
> > 
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at 
> > ./include/linux/sched/mm.h:274
> > 
> > BUG: scheduling while atomic: systemd-udevd/288/0x00000002
> > 
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/filemap.c:2647
> > 
> > however there are also a fatal ones like:
> > 
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000017a87b4
> > 
> > 
> > The issues seems to be a bit random. Looks like memory trashing. 
> > Reverting $subject on top of current linux-next fixes all those issues.
> > 
> > 
> 
> This?
> 
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-replace-local_lock-with-normal-spinlock-fix
> +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -183,8 +183,10 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock)
>  	type *_ret;							\
>  	pcpu_task_pin();						\
>  	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
> -	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags))		\
> +	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags)) {		\
> +		pcpu_task_unpin();					\
>  		_ret = NULL;						\
> +	}								\
>  	_ret;								\
>  })
>  
> 
> I'll drop Mel's patch for next -next.

While we are at it, please consider this cleanup:

 mm/page_alloc.c | 48 +++++++++---------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e538dde2c1c0..a1b76d5fdf75 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -160,61 +160,31 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcp_batch_high_lock);
  * Generic helper to lookup and a per-cpu variable with an embedded spinlock.
  * Return value should be used with equivalent unlock helper.
  */
-#define pcpu_spin_lock(type, member, ptr)				\
-({									\
-	type *_ret;							\
-	pcpu_task_pin();						\
-	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
-	spin_lock(&_ret->member);					\
-	_ret;								\
-})
-
-#define pcpu_spin_lock_irqsave(type, member, ptr, flags)		\
-({									\
-	type *_ret;							\
-	pcpu_task_pin();						\
-	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags);			\
-	_ret;								\
-})
-
-#define pcpu_spin_trylock_irqsave(type, member, ptr, flags)		\
-({									\
-	type *_ret;							\
-	pcpu_task_pin();						\
-	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
-	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&_ret->member, flags))		\
-		_ret = NULL;						\
-	_ret;								\
-})
-
-#define pcpu_spin_unlock(member, ptr)					\
-({									\
-	spin_unlock(&ptr->member);					\
-	pcpu_task_unpin();						\
-})
-
-#define pcpu_spin_unlock_irqrestore(member, ptr, flags)			\
-({									\
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptr->member, flags);			\
-	pcpu_task_unpin();						\
-})
-
-/* struct per_cpu_pages specific helpers. */
-#define pcp_spin_lock(ptr)						\
-	pcpu_spin_lock(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr)
-
 #define pcp_spin_lock_irqsave(ptr, flags)				\
-	pcpu_spin_lock_irqsave(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr, flags)
+({									\
+	struct per_cpu_pages *_ret;					\
+	pcpu_task_pin();						\
+	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&_ret->lock, flags);				\
+	_ret;								\
+})
 
 #define pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(ptr, flags)				\
-	pcpu_spin_trylock_irqsave(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, ptr, flags)
-
-#define pcp_spin_unlock(ptr)						\
-	pcpu_spin_unlock(lock, ptr)
+({									\
+	struct per_cpu_pages *_ret;					\
+	pcpu_task_pin();						\
+	_ret = this_cpu_ptr(ptr);					\
+	if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&_ret->lock, flags))			\
+		_ret = NULL;						\
+	_ret;								\
+})
 
 #define pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(ptr, flags)				\
-	pcpu_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, ptr, flags)
+({									\
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ptr->lock, flags);			\
+	pcpu_task_unpin();						\
+})
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, numa_node);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(numa_node);
@@ -3488,7 +3458,7 @@ void free_unref_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
 
 	zone = page_zone(page);
 	pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
-	pcp = pcpu_spin_trylock_irqsave(struct per_cpu_pages, lock, zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
+	pcp = pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
 	if (pcp) {
 		free_unref_page_commit(pcp, zone, page, migratetype, order);
 		pcp_spin_unlock_irqrestore(pcp, flags);


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-16  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/7] Drain remote per-cpu directly Mel Gorman
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/page_alloc: Add page->buddy_list and page->pcp_list Mel Gorman
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/page_alloc: Use only one PCP list for THP-sized allocations Mel Gorman
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/page_alloc: Split out buddy removal code from rmqueue into separate helper Mel Gorman
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/page_alloc: Remove mistaken page == NULL check in rmqueue Mel Gorman
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/page_alloc: Protect PCP lists with a spinlock Mel Gorman
2022-06-16 15:59   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/page_alloc: Remotely drain per-cpu lists Mel Gorman
2022-06-16 16:41   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-13 12:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/page_alloc: Replace local_lock with normal spinlock Mel Gorman
2022-06-15 22:43   ` Yu Zhao
2022-06-15 22:48   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-06-15 23:04     ` Andrew Morton
2022-06-16  3:05       ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2022-06-17  7:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-17  6:47       ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-06-21  9:21       ` Mel Gorman
2022-06-16 17:01   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-16 21:07     ` Yu Zhao
2022-06-17  7:57       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-06-21  9:27         ` Mel Gorman
2022-06-21  9:26     ` Mel Gorman
2022-06-17  9:39   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-06-21  9:29     ` Mel Gorman
2022-06-21  9:31       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2022-07-03  9:44   ` [mm/page_alloc] 2bd8eec68f: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/gup.c kernel test robot
2022-07-03  9:44     ` kernel test robot
2022-07-03 20:22     ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-03 20:22       ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-05 13:51       ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-05 13:51         ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06  9:55         ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06  9:55           ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06 11:53           ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06 11:53             ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06 14:21             ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06 14:21               ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06 14:52               ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06 14:52                 ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-07  8:22                 ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-07  8:22                   ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06 14:25           ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06 14:25             ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-06 14:53             ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-06 14:53               ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-07 21:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-07 21:55           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-08 10:56           ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-08 10:56             ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-12  5:04             ` Oliver Sang
2022-07-12  5:04               ` Oliver Sang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-24 12:54 [PATCH v5 00/7] Drain remote per-cpu directly Mel Gorman
2022-06-24 12:54 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/page_alloc: Replace local_lock with normal spinlock Mel Gorman
2022-06-24 18:59   ` Yu Zhao
2022-07-04 14:39   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-07-04 16:33   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yqqd5nHeAT77C4D0@google.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.