diff for duplicates of <Yqy0ZhmF8NF4Jzpe@google.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7ceca1c..74a22cc 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -6,7 +6,3 @@ On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:10:06PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
 All architectures use UCALL_MAX_ARGS for that. Are you saying there
 might be limitations beyond the value of the macro? If so, who should
 verify whether this is ok?
-_______________________________________________
-kvmarm mailing list
-kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
-https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index fc22173..8c8b1e1 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,12 +5,13 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: selftests: Increase UCALL_MAX_ARGS to 7\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 17 Jun 2022 17:05:42 +0000\0"
  "To\0Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>\0"
- "Cc\0thuth@redhat.com"
-  kvm@vger.kernel.org
-  maz@kernel.org
+ "Cc\0kvm@vger.kernel.org"
+  kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
   pbonzini@redhat.com
+  seanjc@google.com
   vkuznets@redhat.com
- " kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu\0"
+  thuth@redhat.com
+ " maz@kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 02:10:06PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:\n"
@@ -20,10 +21,6 @@
  "\n"
  "All architectures use UCALL_MAX_ARGS for that. Are you saying there\n"
  "might be limitations beyond the value of the macro? If so, who should\n"
- "verify whether this is ok?\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "kvmarm mailing list\n"
- "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu\n"
- https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
+ verify whether this is ok?
 
-883d5304b920132a5c55e63ae68655b540dfcd1a1bcc31024529c5d7a61b972f
+9c7e5ca6b00877e5d02065639454b63c437b06409d87dc926363e3505af1ec8d
