From: Adam Sindelar <adam@wowsignal.io>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Adam Sindelar <ats@fb.com>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] selftests/vm: Only run 128TBswitch with 5-level paging
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:50:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yr7RdD9MdiopDX/l@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701104934.413146-1-adam@wowsignal.io>
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 12:49:34PM +0200, Adam Sindelar wrote:
> The test va_128TBswitch.c expects to be able to pass mmap an address hint
> and length that cross the address 1<<47. On x86_64, this is not possible
> without 5-level page tables, so the test fails.
>
> The test is already only run on 64-bit powerpc and x86_64 archs, but this
> patch adds an additional check on x86_64 that skips the test if PG_TABLE_LEVELS
> < 5. There is precedent for checking /proc/config.gz in selftests, e.g. in
> selftests/firmware.
>
> Running the tests produces the desired output:
>
> sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=vm run_tests
> ---------------------------
> running ./va_128TBswitch.sh
> ---------------------------
> ./va_128TBswitch.sh: PG_TABLE_LEVELS=4, must be >= 5 to run this test
> [SKIP]
> -------------------------------
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Sindelar <adam@wowsignal.io>
> ---
> V4 -> V5: Renamed "die" to "fail" (missed the review comment, sorry!)
> V3 -> V4: Restrict the check to x86_64
> V2 -> V3: Clean up the commit message
> V1 -> V2: Variables local, fixed Makefile typo, comment on gzip usage
>
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.sh | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> index 44f25acfbeca..6a34209379a4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ TEST_PROGS := run_vmtests.sh
>
> TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.sh
> TEST_FILES += test_hmm.sh
> +TEST_FILES += va_128TBswitch.sh
>
> KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1
> include ../lib.mk
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh
> index 41fce8bea929..27c01c35c7a9 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ if [ $VADDR64 -ne 0 ]; then
> run_test ./virtual_address_range
>
> # virtual address 128TB switch test
> - run_test ./va_128TBswitch
> + run_test ./va_128TBswitch.sh
> fi # VADDR64
>
> # vmalloc stability smoke test
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..334d12715ac3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#
> +# Copyright (C) 2022 Adam Sindelar (Meta) <adam@wowsignal.io>
> +#
> +# This is a test for mmap behavior with 5-level paging. This script wraps the
> +# real test to check that the kernel is configured to support at least 5
> +# pagetable levels.
> +
> +# 1 means the test failed
> +exitcode=1
> +
> +# Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
> +ksft_skip=4
> +
> +fail()
> +{
> + echo "$1"
> + exit $exitcode
> +}
> +
> +check_supported_x86_64()
> +{
> + local config="/proc/config.gz"
> + [[ -f "${config}" ]] || config="/boot/config-$(uname -r)"
> + [[ -f "${config}" ]] || fail "Cannot find kernel config in /proc or /boot"
> +
> + # gzip -dcfq automatically handles both compressed and plaintext input.
> + # See man 1 gzip under '-f'.
> + local pg_table_levels=$(gzip -dcfq "${config}" | grep PGTABLE_LEVELS | cut -d'=' -f 2)
> +
> + if [[ "${pg_table_levels}" -lt 5 ]]; then
> + echo "$0: PGTABLE_LEVELS=${pg_table_levels}, must be >= 5 to run this test"
> + exit $ksft_skip
> + fi
> +}
> +
> +check_test_requirements()
> +{
> + # The test supports x86_64 and powerpc64. We currently have no useful
> + # eligibility check for powerpc64, and the test itself will reject other
> + # architectures.
> + case `uname -m` in
> + "x86_64")
> + check_supported_x86_64
> + ;;
> + *)
> + return 0
> + ;;
> + esac
> +}
> +
> +check_test_requirements
> +./va_128TBswitch
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Apologies for sending such a minor revision, but I'd realized I missed
an earlier review comment and wanted to address it.
-Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 10:49 [PATCH v5] selftests/vm: Only run 128TBswitch with 5-level paging Adam Sindelar
2022-07-01 10:50 ` Adam Sindelar [this message]
2022-07-01 14:21 ` David Vernet
2022-07-01 16:32 ` Adam Sindelar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yr7RdD9MdiopDX/l@debian \
--to=adam@wowsignal.io \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ats@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.