From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
mike.kravetz@oracle.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
smuchun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:44:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrAzeHbYt1mAs9ue@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrAv18GnMOcQaAxz@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 04:29:11PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > Although it works, I think PageVmemmapSelfHosted() check for the 1st pfn's
> > > vmemmap page is not always reliable. Since we reused PG_owner_priv_1
> > > as PG_vmemmap_self_hosted, the test is noly reliable for vmemmap page's
> > > vmemmap page. Other non-vmemmap page can be flagged with PG_owner_priv_1.
> > > So this check can be false-positive. Maybe the following code snippet is
> > > the solution.
> >
> > How could that happen for pages used for backing a vmemmap?
> >
>
> It cannot happen for memmap_on_memory case. Howwver, it can happen for other
> cases. E.g. the 1st pfn (of boot memory block) whose vmemmap page may be flagged
> as PG_owner_priv_1 (if PG_swapcache is set). Then, the check is false-positive.
If this can really happen, which I am not that sure tbh, maybe a way out would be
to just define a new page-type as we did in previous versions of memmap_on_memory.
In that way we would not for flags, but for its type.
But as I said, I am not entirely sure about the potential fallout of what you mention.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-20 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 13:38 [PATCH v4 0/2] make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory Muchun Song
2022-06-19 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: memory_hotplug: enumerate all supported section flags Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 8:16 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-19 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: memory_hotplug: make hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap compatible with memmap_on_memory Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:22 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-20 7:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 8:29 ` Muchun Song
2022-06-20 8:44 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2022-06-20 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-06-20 9:05 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrAzeHbYt1mAs9ue@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.