Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document additional sc8280xp devices

[Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>]

On Wed 22 Jun 03:47 CDT 2022, Johan Hovold wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:12:19PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > Add the CRD (Customer Reference Design?) and the Lenovo Thinkpad X13s to
> 
> Qualcomm refers to "Compute Reference Design", for example, in commit
> 427b249504ea ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280-crd: Add device tree files for
> CRD").
> 

I'll align with that expansion of the abbreviation, thanks.

> > the valid device compatibles found on the sc8280xp platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Added the two missing board compatibles
> > 
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > index 5c06d1bfc046..6ec7521be19d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ properties:
> >  
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> > +              - lenovo,thinkpad-x13s
> > +              - qcom,sc8280xp-crd
> >                - qcom,sc8280xp-qrd
> 
> I believe the "qcom,sc8280xp-qrd" entry was a mistake and should have
> been "-crd" all along? Perhaps you should remove that entry in this
> patch.

It was a mistake on my part adding the QRD when apparently I had a CRD,
but I still believe both exists, so I'd prefer to just keep them around.

Regards,
Bjorn

> 
> >            - const: qcom,sc8280xp
> 
> Looks good otherwise:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> 
> Johan