From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A516C43334 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229758AbiFXKoB (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:44:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52876 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229571AbiFXKoB (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:44:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277EA522C0; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id r20so2605040wra.1; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KXP2NoRUSiA/f1IWzAj8E8aTf8Sj6tyMk16O8T/6F9E=; b=LdEhM6018+juissl5qFXGFrAbw3UNUVRMtgdqZBN497/h6BObOLGfeRjBMsgeHdu0g Ol9hpM0mw0oPbuZJtH4ITBV+JvXb6cdvrHen3Jbv7Blsuyk0ttUJQJO4PS+HiDxrHS0J mSth07Ig7a9qTX1ipELnzivZxJBZNjCaKtwksFewRSzqQd+IK0nCKgU/R8JZeGP0hZOk R2YFy9tfHEkGd+1oBGDnvKX9M9lyxk7aAhtObjKRici78PDsby7y5SQ4JbKz5M5RKW1y uWOcYCn28OodNG5un/X0xMg8b+DrFXM//osPikNp9dYTthIngTzwGNyeNKCaF2nd2bBp 0E8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=KXP2NoRUSiA/f1IWzAj8E8aTf8Sj6tyMk16O8T/6F9E=; b=ztkNFdiUpMZqh7LG6XLtGb0TXZoIIpo5SBLe9GXzPlGKM7WHwNaVWwjX0zPS7qftIN tgAe8s3TpA7hz5mfVVYI151ah9aezC3OD0Beb2AiKfrgnMTHnYD8RqopQ8deacpLZpbb 83WesjgpLLrn6Evsjvs2b/qkDUQQAcLubQLADtBVrL/vh1uo9Brneo+GjMBYeZFZDzAN A9RFs2jetPzjo28bYCwby0lDnoBcv3vqYyKhbGZXhLcEZdlo7Btis5N8b3HDWkKs/pV/ E32EJL5bU6cAVMmXX8uFewlnKRlW7ncNNpoOWMlqnrbgwHs6XeAD1UYy0/za8Bh9iz3K Xu4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+fzRaiaNwOfSGrq0QoyAB5I3K0CpN3ewl7+HREIwAcm4EfZCax woP5T91owFI29oiJ2i/sg1k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sTiGmuDrh6YeoyUG0aOXQ9XW3xuZRmLNgXr1kkVXSNVtkGXTed4M0vyU42GsR+8e6iKt6QoA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:168a:b0:21b:b8a4:799 with SMTP id y10-20020a056000168a00b0021bb8a40799mr1101234wrd.56.1656067438615; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-47-22.as13285.net. [78.150.47.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j19-20020a05600c191300b0039ef836d841sm6918970wmq.42.2022.06.24.03.43.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:43:56 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.125-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220623164322.296526800@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220623164322.296526800@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:44:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.125 release. > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220621): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1380 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1385 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip