From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53719C43334 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 10:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230014AbiFXKpd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:45:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229464AbiFXKpb (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:45:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5295536A; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id z11so2846567edp.9; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vD8qTDNfZOQ6NPYpH26T+Xs/UdmEQBlYDvLq5NZ9kMA=; b=HUCDUn1TsftDl9cyoWqdrcOk8paUH3ZsAqdqQ9p6jcRDpkxla6x6Hd0Rcw1m4yNbDG 00ahyYm3vG/6aYamqFqJG8zSEScQqCSejV/e1ut6k5QErm9w2rc5nglt88R2WZZ4pfcj ugr8oPsLKBqgGAHFvxG31p06lKSXD6e/bwnzvpDpS+mElHByKQTR5+5BEIP5FRxKwn5b Wr/nIh5CTvb5Ghv0Y7AfQAw9aFwTPnF7CzIFJHCebMuQjWeE42z/lcUSfJzPcciCcIS/ 36HY3q1mD6COUjpisiPt1A2SIEdQgrXon5UIsgXABj2jTx78BDxT5mLrhK9BPMb1uXxN ZzTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vD8qTDNfZOQ6NPYpH26T+Xs/UdmEQBlYDvLq5NZ9kMA=; b=00/XtNLEWQlh7UFB/pACmFUNbkTgLDb+tYZrUwP0maKPztSrbvScChWN5ruN/MpPSw PgkFGCa6NEO+xJerUtfsnfmKBDfoRQhEZg9vwzU4u37PSqb5PVEwhEtX+RQlt7+kmf6l 7w45M0qQvHCVRxcb+oXIftxoo2XOawwu9oF5IaWfBm8CbEWu1nVHaW7fq7h65DA4IIxn kgWDq/DmyBE/shggJcvqhGBGJCIar0cB3c0LMzNlHcU8u774vXt1TOIooMnQp0QXuntP qvZFZHF0yy1hw028lFzpCB775yfUg4gqP/wcozcz98WB1/T203f7fr/sosRtPpnRRwRD wD1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/71XFqViSfqaD0Pb/uRQcLFHIDgHPOd5j1Z1X9qh3dDgETyVPm TausoJ8/4NXNky+aSER+Sjc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ve5r84sbDZYWwRrYlt9CZ15HqfxjLKLM2sQcB0POHAygnIpAi9Bi2clBLt5q7hlL/ZUd/oHg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3909:b0:435:7a69:2cfd with SMTP id fe9-20020a056402390900b004357a692cfdmr16837153edb.166.1656067528339; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-47-22.as13285.net. [78.150.47.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9-20020aa7d489000000b004358243e752sm1713883edr.5.2022.06.24.03.45.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 11:45:26 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/11] 5.4.201-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220623164321.195163701@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220623164321.195163701@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 06:45:04PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.201 release. > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Jun 2022 16:43:11 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220621): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1384 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip