From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Use "unsigned int", not "u32", for SPTEs' @access info
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrX2ja1r1/7LGv+k@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624171808.2845941-3-seanjc@google.com>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 05:18:07PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use an "unsigned int" for @access parameters instead of a "u32", mostly
> to be consistent throughout KVM, but also because "u32" is misleading.
> @access can actually squeeze into a u8, i.e. doesn't need 32 bits, but is
> as an "unsigned int" because sp->role.access is an unsigned int.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YqyZxEfxXLsHGoZ%2F@google.com
> Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 17:18 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Cleanups for eager page splitting Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid subtle pointer arithmetic in kvm_mmu_child_role() Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 17:33 ` David Matlack
2022-06-24 18:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Use "unsigned int", not "u32", for SPTEs' @access info Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 17:38 ` David Matlack [this message]
2022-06-24 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Buffer nested MMU split_desc_cache only by default capacity Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 17:39 ` David Matlack
2022-06-25 8:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Cleanups for eager page splitting Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrX2ja1r1/7LGv+k@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.