From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E34C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236985AbiGMPgK (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:36:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236991AbiGMPgH (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:36:07 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3261F4E845; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F83B8204D; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F184C34114; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1657726558; bh=mgxy9tQlFOmuXGe/eDtjY4cNpf4Y+AzDQIzHZ79WdcU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pYuTs0tk2wj9krwWwVU7XAoM7TqSndfIBr601D0J36JHSuzoIsmSftnD3LfBN6j5f CYyX76ZU0MrLKgJD/zO+5IhBxFj7Ecl2Nv56vs33nbQsSofTebQ0St3dfQAy2/JxL6 RpzqIQIwIHqfOlPztwzTmSGZW4F4OGi0ri2DGtJ0= Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:35:54 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Dario Binacchi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe , Jeroen Hofstee , Linux Memory Management List , kernel test robot , lkp@intel.com, lkp@lists.01.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Slaby , Marc Kleine-Budde , Paolo Abeni , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Vincent Mailhol , Wolfgang Grandegger , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: slcan: do not sleep with a spin lock held Message-ID: References: <20220713151947.56379-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220713151947.56379-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 05:19:47PM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote: > We can't call close_candev() with a spin lock held, so release the lock > before calling it. > > Fixes: c4e54b063f42f ("can: slcan: use CAN network device driver API") > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/Ysrf1Yc5DaRGN1WE@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi > > --- > > drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > index 54d29a410ad5..6aaf2986effc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ static int slc_close(struct net_device *dev) > /* TTY discipline is running. */ > clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &sl->tty->flags); > } > + spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock); > netif_stop_queue(dev); Can you have a lock held when calling netif_stop_queue()? You don't mention this in your changelog text :( thanks, greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4627ACCA479 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E9D3CA8CE for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:36:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECD93CA757 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:36:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33AAC600BFA for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:36:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C28618B6; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F184C34114; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 15:35:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1657726558; bh=mgxy9tQlFOmuXGe/eDtjY4cNpf4Y+AzDQIzHZ79WdcU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pYuTs0tk2wj9krwWwVU7XAoM7TqSndfIBr601D0J36JHSuzoIsmSftnD3LfBN6j5f CYyX76ZU0MrLKgJD/zO+5IhBxFj7Ecl2Nv56vs33nbQsSofTebQ0St3dfQAy2/JxL6 RpzqIQIwIHqfOlPztwzTmSGZW4F4OGi0ri2DGtJ0= Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:35:54 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Dario Binacchi Message-ID: References: <20220713151947.56379-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220713151947.56379-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] can: slcan: do not sleep with a spin lock held X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lkp@intel.com, lkp@lists.01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeroen Hofstee , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management List , Eric Dumazet , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , kernel test robot , Vincent Mailhol , Jakub Kicinski , Marc Kleine-Budde , Paolo Abeni , Jiri Slaby , "David S. Miller" , ltp@lists.linux.it, Wolfgang Grandegger Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 05:19:47PM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote: > We can't call close_candev() with a spin lock held, so release the lock > before calling it. > > Fixes: c4e54b063f42f ("can: slcan: use CAN network device driver API") > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/Ysrf1Yc5DaRGN1WE@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/ > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi > > --- > > drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > index 54d29a410ad5..6aaf2986effc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ static int slc_close(struct net_device *dev) > /* TTY discipline is running. */ > clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &sl->tty->flags); > } > + spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock); > netif_stop_queue(dev); Can you have a lock held when calling netif_stop_queue()? You don't mention this in your changelog text :( thanks, greg k-h -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4747486485335499670==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: slcan: do not sleep with a spin lock held Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20220713151947.56379-1-dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com> List-Id: --===============4747486485335499670== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 05:19:47PM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote: > We can't call close_candev() with a spin lock held, so release the lock > before calling it. > = > Fixes: c4e54b063f42f ("can: slcan: use CAN network device driver API") > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/Ysrf1Yc5DaRGN1WE(a)xsang-OptiP= lex-9020/ > Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi > = > --- > = > drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > = > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/slcan/s= lcan-core.c > index 54d29a410ad5..6aaf2986effc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan/slcan-core.c > @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ static int slc_close(struct net_device *dev) > /* TTY discipline is running. */ > clear_bit(TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP, &sl->tty->flags); > } > + spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock); > netif_stop_queue(dev); Can you have a lock held when calling netif_stop_queue()? You don't mention this in your changelog text :( thanks, greg k-h --===============4747486485335499670==--