From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com, urezki@gmail.com,
neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com, frederic@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 21:39:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ys87ks05PD17dFz1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220713213237.1596225-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:32:33PM +0000, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> + * Furthermore, if CPU A invoked call_rcu() and CPU B invoked the
> + * resulting RCU callback function "func()", then both CPU A and CPU B are
> + * guaranteed to execute a full memory barrier during the time interval
> + * between the call to call_rcu() and the invocation of "func()" -- even
> + * if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but again only if the system has
> + * more than one CPU).
> + *
> + * Implementation of these memory-ordering guarantees is described here:
> + * Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst.
> + */
> +void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
> +{
> + return __call_rcu_common(head, func, force_call_rcu_to_lazy);
> +
> +}
I will kill that extra new line. LOL something always has to go wrong no
matter how many hours you spend making sure eveyrthing is good :) Luckily
cosmetic here.
thanks,
- Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-13 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 21:32 [PATCH v3 0/5] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-13 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] rcu: Introduce call_rcu_lazy() API implementation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-13 21:39 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2022-07-13 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] rcu: shrinker for lazy rcu Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-13 21:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] rcuscale: Add laziness and kfree tests Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-13 21:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Move call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() in some paths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-13 21:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcutorture: Add test code for call_rcu_lazy() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2022-07-14 20:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Implement call_rcu_lazy() and miscellaneous fixes Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-14 21:33 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-07-14 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-15 15:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-07-15 15:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-15 15:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-07-15 15:50 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-07-15 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-23 17:19 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ys87ks05PD17dFz1@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rushikesh.s.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.