From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: Make scsi_forget_host() wait for request queue removal
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:38:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsOyHnIydqVdRVnQ@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220630213733.17689-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:37:32PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Prepare for freeing the host tag set earlier by making scsi_forget_host()
> wait until all activity on the host tag set has stopped.
I think it is correct to free the host tag during removing host.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 5c3bb4ceeac3..c8331ccdde95 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -1961,6 +1961,16 @@ void scsi_scan_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_scan_host);
>
> +/**
> + * scsi_forget_host() - Remove all SCSI devices from a host.
> + * @shost: SCSI host to remove devices from.
> + *
> + * Removes all SCSI devices that have not yet been removed. For the SCSI devices
> + * for which removal started before scsi_forget_host(), wait until the
> + * associated request queue has reached the "dead" state. In that state it is
> + * guaranteed that no new requests will be allocated and also that no requests
> + * are in progress anymore.
> + */
> void scsi_forget_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> {
> struct scsi_device *sdev;
> @@ -1970,8 +1980,21 @@ void scsi_forget_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> restart:
> spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(sdev, &shost->__devices, siblings) {
> - if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL)
> + if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL &&
> + blk_queue_dead(sdev->request_queue)) {
> continue;
> + }
> + if (sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL) {
> + get_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> + spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
> +
> + while (!blk_queue_dead(sdev->request_queue))
> + msleep(10);
Thinking of further, this report on UAF on SRP resource and Changhui's
report on UAF of host->hostt should belong to same kind of issue:
1) after scsi_remove_host() returns, either the HBA driver module can be
unloaded and hostt can't be used, or any HBA resources can be freed, both
may cause UAF in scsi_mq_exit_request, so moving freeing host tagset to
scsi_remove_host() is correct.
static void scsi_mq_exit_request()
{
...
if (shost->hostt->exit_cmd_priv)
shost->hostt->exit_cmd_priv(shost, cmd);
}
2) checking request queue dead here isn't good, which not only relies
on block layer implementation detail, but also can't avoid UAF on ->hostt,
I'd suggest to fix them all. The attached patch may drain all sdevs, which
can replace the 2nd patch if you don't mind, but the 3rd patch is still needed:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index e1cb187402fd..6445718c2b18 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
@@ -189,6 +189,14 @@ void scsi_remove_host(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
transport_unregister_device(&shost->shost_gendev);
device_unregister(&shost->shost_dev);
device_del(&shost->shost_gendev);
+
+ /*
+ * Once returning, the scsi LLD module can be unloaded, so we have
+ * to wait until our descendants are released, otherwise our host
+ * device reference can be grabbed by them, then use-after-free
+ * on shost->hostt will be triggered
+ */
+ wait_for_completion(&shost->targets_completion);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_remove_host);
@@ -393,6 +401,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&shost->starved_list);
init_waitqueue_head(&shost->host_wait);
mutex_init(&shost->scan_mutex);
+ init_completion(&shost->targets_completion);
index = ida_simple_get(&host_index_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (index < 0) {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
index 10e5bffc34aa..b6e6354da396 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
@@ -545,10 +545,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_get);
*/
void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
- struct module *mod = sdev->host->hostt->module;
-
+ module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
- module_put(mod);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_put);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index 2ef78083f1ef..931333a48372 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -406,9 +406,14 @@ static void scsi_target_destroy(struct scsi_target *starget)
static void scsi_target_dev_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct device *parent = dev->parent;
+ struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(parent);
struct scsi_target *starget = to_scsi_target(dev);
kfree(starget);
+
+ if (!atomic_dec_return(&shost->nr_targets))
+ complete_all(&shost->targets_completion);
+
put_device(parent);
}
@@ -521,6 +526,7 @@ static struct scsi_target *scsi_alloc_target(struct device *parent,
starget->state = STARGET_CREATED;
starget->scsi_level = SCSI_2;
starget->max_target_blocked = SCSI_DEFAULT_TARGET_BLOCKED;
+ atomic_inc(&shost->nr_targets);
retry:
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
index 94091d5281ba..28c51ef0ea54 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
@@ -449,12 +449,9 @@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)
struct scsi_vpd *vpd_pg80 = NULL, *vpd_pg83 = NULL;
struct scsi_vpd *vpd_pg0 = NULL, *vpd_pg89 = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
- struct module *mod;
sdev = container_of(work, struct scsi_device, ew.work);
- mod = sdev->host->hostt->module;
-
scsi_dh_release_device(sdev);
parent = sdev->sdev_gendev.parent;
@@ -505,17 +502,11 @@ static void scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext(struct work_struct *work)
if (parent)
put_device(parent);
- module_put(mod);
}
static void scsi_device_dev_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct scsi_device *sdp = to_scsi_device(dev);
-
- /* Set module pointer as NULL in case of module unloading */
- if (!try_module_get(sdp->host->hostt->module))
- sdp->host->hostt->module = NULL;
-
execute_in_process_context(scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext,
&sdp->ew);
}
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
index 37718373defc..d0baffd62287 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -710,6 +710,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
/* ldm bits */
struct device shost_gendev, shost_dev;
+ atomic_t nr_targets;
+ struct completion targets_completion;
+
/*
* Points to the transport data (if any) which is allocated
* separately
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 21:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] Call blk_mq_free_tag_set() earlier Bart Van Assche
2022-06-30 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: Simplify scsi_forget_host() Bart Van Assche
2022-07-05 2:40 ` Ming Lei
2022-06-30 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: Make scsi_forget_host() wait for request queue removal Bart Van Assche
2022-07-01 16:25 ` Mike Christie
2022-07-01 23:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-05 3:38 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-06-30 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: core: Call blk_mq_free_tag_set() earlier Bart Van Assche
2022-07-01 3:44 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-01 7:25 ` lizhijian
2022-07-01 7:45 ` Li, Zhijian
2022-07-01 14:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-01 14:37 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-01 23:58 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YsOyHnIydqVdRVnQ@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.