Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] qapi: golang: Add CommandResult type to Go

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 08:46:21AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > +type EmptyCommandReturn struct {
> > +    CommandId string          `json:"id,omitempty"`
> > +    Error     *QapiError      `json:"error,omitempty"`
> > +    Name      string          `json:"-"`
> > +}
> 
> Do we need a specific type for this? Can't we just generate an
> appropriately-named type for each of the commands that don't return
> any data? It's not like we would have to write that code manually :)

Yes, I think having an explicit named return struct even for commands
not /currently/ returning data is good, and anticipates future changes
that might add extra return data fields to the QAPI schema.

> 
> > +func (r *EmptyCommandReturn) GetCommandName() string {
> > +    return r.Name
> > +}
> 
> Just like Event.GetName() and Command.GetName(), I'm not convinced we
> should have this.
> 

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|