From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:53:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ysg23mJmFiBc/eA1@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708093213.1635880-1-john@metanate.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:32:12AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> It seems that the intent here is to skip blk_flush_plug() in the case
> where a non-preemptible lock (such as a spinlock) has been converted to
> a rtmutex on RT, which is the case covered by the SM_RTLOCK_WAIT
> schedule flag. But sched_submit_work() is only called from schedule()
> which is never called in this scenario, so the check can simply be
> deleted.
> include/linux/sched/rt.h | 8 --------
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/rt.h b/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> index e5af028c08b49..994c25640e156 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> @@ -39,20 +39,12 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> extern void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *pi_task);
> extern void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *p);
> -static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> - return tsk->pi_blocked_on != NULL;
> -}
> #else
> static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> # define rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p) do { } while (0)
> -static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> #endif
>
> extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);
Excellent, glad to see the back of that.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1d4660a1915b3..e4974fe003b5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6578,9 +6578,6 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
> io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
> }
>
> - if (tsk_is_pi_blocked(tsk))
> - return;
> -
Would it make sense to replace this with:
SCHED_WARN_ON(current->__state & TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
Along with a comment along the lines of:
> - spinlock and rwlock must not flush block requests. This will deadlock
> if the callback attempts to acquire a lock which is already acquired.
> Similarly to being preempted, there should be no warning if the
> scheduling point is within a RCU read section.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-08 9:32 [PATCH v2] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug John Keeping
2022-07-08 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ysg23mJmFiBc/eA1@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.