From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC69C433EF for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5A41614; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:45:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz 7D5A41614 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1657295155; bh=C2o8pnQg49NHc81qJegDak3fh/DbNuvU6TDy4IEp1nA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=TkUCuAvrC4Wpr4sP2ZTOT66FCWSSyO6aY4u7WgYU3y4IyUNrFAl4dqaM9h/h1s5St 84lPS+VRPAh0c6eDoPa7xNC3R1C+DlLt7G6FTl4B3zxIrsphheIXnroCuz0N++IGMD TZs17HQg4NnuqSHJR2wyGsMxCzCTPFzf9wL7PzcM= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4A5F8053B; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:45:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 88221F80166; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:45:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE40F80166 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 17:44:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz ADE40F80166 Authentication-Results: alsa1.perex.cz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="p7HdZb2I" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBABB60EAD; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35E99C341C0; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:44:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657295096; bh=C2o8pnQg49NHc81qJegDak3fh/DbNuvU6TDy4IEp1nA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=p7HdZb2IKyKj9aV2OP461sfgSCAkq3EKwTxkbBaYF/Szefi7nIFHxlyaMEsx7+F6D UZU9X7z0fq+M+W5iJMpZilXRCizHYQuf3ibCdW0cIpmO+9q8BQpv9iygbLvDCYO51u aaAG/0YXh13eQmaNE28AKgL/zz3pUS4g6iHrAV81stosCBlrtlrqalGWgOsBENvONF swb1jyVXKyUypm7jLgoTdHeXzfRjuoBFlvFdAjZPRXFJYK4XUmf4QJVpzYZguWw5Lg 4cdbRX1s8GUSjh0sJOqO1KoB3sKtEQZrKGNqRT2hi8RxJNfA8FfaC0yacpq7Pp777N h+xBq5OuLDAwA== Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 16:44:48 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Pierre-Louis Bossart Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: Mark BE DAIs as nonatomic for hsw and Message-ID: References: <20220624134317.3656128-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> <3d9b45c0-b415-21d9-6af5-68fa1001ed17@intel.com> <34b54e4e-8997-c2b7-fdf0-24a1b95121ab@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bcVYb0lY7rinzLlw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34b54e4e-8997-c2b7-fdf0-24a1b95121ab@linux.intel.com> X-Cookie: Baby On Board. Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, Cezary Rojewski , amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.com X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" --bcVYb0lY7rinzLlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:45:30AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 6/25/22 03:29, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > > Warning is one thing, but will you be also getting rid of the > > if-statement in soc-pcm.c that actually forces nonatomic=1 on BE when FE > > is already declared as such? If the if-statement stays, I believe the > > declaring BE DAIs 'correctly' in the way to go. > I meant just removing the dev_warn() only. > See https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3723 Is something going to be upstreamed here? I don't really mind which solution is adopted here but right now Cezary's patches are the ones that were posted upstream. --bcVYb0lY7rinzLlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmLIUO8ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Ckgwf+Irg6zg2BsL8c1Oiv+50hqBPXRBjaBs3OV1bfLZC+BdndYzLyY1gyO2qC ty7mmAskWzLVTp9+ofRukWK/6hPt6SQkGp2JMxaxHXgU+tnV+GeGttRDfzgqnh9d TeZFZAsMWrJIPE3GYdx1KJyke9g4nNCPh+N5e184XMss/Tn1r2ozomvEubnBOBaE wyfP60qhNjKqihTFzr1lXEBMUShqrifhIIzGwPp8A+PeDzRSXEwsKGoSyoxU1n36 1TaqdnG+S7EIvH+9liMZ0HYlt3iYX12f0N9VWVhcIWW6SpDG90XeY7wtvH/apZz0 kahZqQ1zmuTPBBFSksFdn1GXXnC5WA== =teEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bcVYb0lY7rinzLlw--