From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35758C433EF for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E763CA695 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:55:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4473C8BCB for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:55:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9345F1A006BB for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED671FF6C; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:55:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1657522501; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DcQm/x7fzqlljLD1Uiy+/zhLSDNvozibLdt//5bWI0s=; b=m3QM8ey8Uen0z5hjtHVBmq5slfI8SI4qp3AiUKsr4aPsQRbTffTPH+89fRqFauveg6QUre JOunLZ6Am8RWNB1v/3VX6me6oFv+xvBlIVnxMM/3CBvi7dDfvi++8Lrwb0ZNFl76RMtbck htxlnyBgFU4IPRXB840IopKku1Qzvk8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1657522501; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DcQm/x7fzqlljLD1Uiy+/zhLSDNvozibLdt//5bWI0s=; b=Hx6whoNKchS84e8ZfgjNugCzazJ2j73CZ2hAO227SaCvFdFUomCMFRH+vToDngwJC4Xwmq g2gEjLP1DJW/Z0CA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973AE13524; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id UDVcI0XJy2LlewAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 11 Jul 2022 06:55:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:54:59 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" Message-ID: References: <20220706155817.28340-1-akumar@suse.de> <62C6452F.907@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62C6452F.907@fujitsu.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] dup07.c: Rewrite using new LTP API X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Avinesh, Xu, > Hi Avinesh > I did't look this cleanup patch, but I see the old code is same as > dup202.c(This case covers more situation, ie using chmod). Maybe we can > just add a test_variant to use dup syscall in dup202.c? > Then remove this case directly. +1, yes, the code in both tests indeed does the same. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp