All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Ensure PSR gets disabled if no encoders in new state
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:09:49 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ysvo3QCqJc+v782v@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711061601.654694-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 09:16:01AM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote:
> Currently PSR is left enabled when all planes are disabled if there
> is no attached encoder in new state. This seems to be causing FIFO
> underruns.
> 
> Fix this by checking if old and new crtc encoder masks are differing.
> PSR is disabled for encoders not in new crtc state encoder mask.
> 
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index e6a870641cd2..710cc31ace22 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1863,36 +1863,66 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  				struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> -	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> -		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> +	struct intel_psr *psr;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(i915))
>  		return;
>  
> -	for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
> -					     crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> -		struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> -		struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
> -		bool needs_to_disable = false;
> -
> -		mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> -
> +	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> +					    new_crtc_state, i) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Reasons to disable:
> -		 * - PSR disabled in new state
> -		 * - All planes will go inactive
> -		 * - Changing between PSR versions
> +		 * Check if encoder exists in new state and disable
> +		 * psr if it doesn't. Otherwise we will end update
> +		 * having all planes disabled and psr enabled which
> +		 * seems to be causing problems.
>  		 */
> -		needs_to_disable |= intel_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state);
> -		needs_to_disable |= !crtc_state->has_psr;
> -		needs_to_disable |= !crtc_state->active_planes;
> -		needs_to_disable |= crtc_state->has_psr2 != psr->psr2_enabled;
> +		if (old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask != new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +			for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
> +							     old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +				intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +				psr = &intel_dp->psr;
>  
> -		if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
> -			intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> +				if (new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask &
> +				    drm_encoder_mask(&(encoder)->base))
> +					continue;
>  
> -		mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> +				mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> +
> +				if (psr->enabled)
> +					intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> +
> +				mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
> +						     new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +			bool needs_to_disable = false;
> +
> +			intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +			psr = &intel_dp->psr;
> +
> +			mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Reasons to disable:
> +			 * - PSR disabled in new state
> +			 * - All planes will go inactive
> +			 * - Changing between PSR versions
> +			 */
> +			needs_to_disable |= intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state);
> +			needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->has_psr;
> +			needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->active_planes;
> +			needs_to_disable |= new_crtc_state->has_psr2 != psr->psr2_enabled;
> +
> +			if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
> +				intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);
> +
> +			mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> +		}
>  	}
>  }

Looks correct to me, the only thing that we could probable unite both for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr
cycles and also then get rid of if (old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask != new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) check by
doing something like:

old_new_encoder_mask = old_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask |  new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask;

for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder, old_new_encoder_mask) {
	bool needs_to_disable = false;

	intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);

	psr = &intel_dp->psr;

	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);

        needs_to_disable |= intel_crtc_needs_modeset(new_crtc_state);        
        needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->has_psr;
        needs_to_disable |= !new_crtc_state->active_planes;
        needs_to_disable |= new_crtc_state->has_psr2 != psr->psr2_enabled;

	/* Check if this encoder isn't present in new mask */
        needs_to_disable |= !(new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask & drm_encoder_mask(&(encoder)->base));

	if (psr->enabled && needs_to_disable)
		 intel_psr_disable_locked(intel_dp);

	mutex_unlock(&psr_lock);
}

So basically we make non-presence of the encoder in new mask to be just one more check
for needs_to_disable and have a single place where we turn it off..

Stan

>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-11  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  6:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Ensure PSR gets disabled if no encoders in new state Jouni Högander
2022-07-11  6:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-07-11  8:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-07-11  9:09 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ysvo3QCqJc+v782v@intel.com \
    --to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.