From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AE38C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156053CA154 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:00:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07DE3C7FCC for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:00:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1621F10005C0 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:00:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458CF37AD0; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1658840426; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hGZaTeamaLH0S4xpU6ZgqBI4YwradVFRf+c7qi6Z8OE=; b=ifF/ugs2dfZFkirKXuNQE6CPk4rsQlP2UW12FTx8mYR4yzg1zOhULE6bVKwLwzu2ZneO8u owuZxqQEPyCJ94rUXbCQHrz2ulPrvw8K2XDG0rmOZqwQF4q0A/e4lXELzYKrBFNUfec0yo 0MVMj2+zkRDfkgJi46A4eDhCTjuJoYw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1658840426; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hGZaTeamaLH0S4xpU6ZgqBI4YwradVFRf+c7qi6Z8OE=; b=KvnREvZWMmB/c3c4udro3r6/49ikIwrk3d/dKRY/sLMw+1oiyZeLPQ4fVyvpysJ7yX+jay GkvDrDuQ7qThfyAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0894813A7C; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id Ok5RAGrl32IJEQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:00:26 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:00:23 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 00/18] Expand Cgroup lib and modify controller tests X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi Petr, > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 1:15 AM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Luke, > > could you please next time use the same version number for all patches? > > Having different versions (patches have v2, v3, v5) is quite confusing. > > Kind regards, > > Petr > Yeah I agree.. > It was supposed to make it easier to not have to re review stuff when the > version hasn't changed, but it gets quite confusing. > I'll use the same version number next time. Thanks! NOTE: If you want to increase readability, just add "Changes vN+1->vN:" into cover letter (or to patches themselves). Kind regards, Petr > - Luke -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp