All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net,
	paskripkin@gmail.com, straube.linux@gmail.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
	abdun.nihaal@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_pwr_wakeup to correct error code semantics
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:03:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yt8FBtHnNCGSZAf/@equinox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725104027.GO2338@kadam>

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 01:40:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 05:30:55PM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> > Convert the rtw_pwr_wakeup function to use 0 on success and -EPERM on
> > error - in all places where we handle this response, we use either -1 or
> > -EPERM currently anyway, which are equivalent. Also, for other places
> > along the same call chain where we are using -1, use -EPERM.
> > 
> 
> I can't get behind a change to -EPERM.  Try to pick an appropriate
> error code.  I'm not going to be very strict on it, but we have to at
> least *try*.
> 
> Probably, leave the return -1; lines alone.  Fixing that seems like an
> unrelated change.  We need to do this kind of change but I got bitten by
> it before so I want to avoid that next time.  My reviews will hopefully
> be more careful now.
> 
> > This gets the driver closer to removal of the non-standard _SUCCESS and
> > _FAIL definitions, which are inverted compared to the standard in-kernel
> > error code mechanism.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c       |  4 +--
> >  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c   | 10 +++---
> >  drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c | 32 ++++++++++----------
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> > index c306aafa183b..bd654d4ff8b4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_p2p.c
> > @@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@ int rtw_p2p_enable(struct adapter *padapter, enum P2P_ROLE role)
> >  
> >  	if (role == P2P_ROLE_DEVICE || role == P2P_ROLE_CLIENT || role == P2P_ROLE_GO) {
> >  		/* leave IPS/Autosuspend */
> > -		if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter) == _FAIL) {
> > +		if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> >  			ret = _FAIL;
> >  			goto exit;
> >  		}
> 
> Fine.  The caller now changes from negative error codes to _SUCCESS/_FAIL.
> Later we will transition this to normal error codes so we'll update it
> to preserve the error code from rtw_pwr_wakeup() at that point.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> > index 930bb4aea435..e0ae0c3c51f8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/ioctl_linux.c
> > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_mode(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *a,
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> > +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> >  		ret = -EPERM;
> >  		goto exit;
> >  	}
> 
> This code is returning negative error codes so it should preserve the
> code from rtw_pwr_wakeup().
> 
> 	ret = rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter);
> 	if (ret)
> 		goto exit;
> 
> > @@ -933,13 +933,13 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_wap(struct net_device *dev,
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> > -		ret = -1;
> > +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> > +		ret = -EPERM;
> 
> Same.
> 
> >  		goto exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	if (!padapter->bup) {
> > -		ret = -1;
> > +		ret = -EPERM;
> 
> Unrelated.
> 
> >  		goto exit;
> >  	}
> >  
> 
> [ snip ]
> 
> > @@ -1252,13 +1252,13 @@ static int rtw_wx_set_essid(struct net_device *dev,
> >  
> >  	uint ret = 0, len;
> >  
> > -	if (_FAIL == rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> > -		ret = -1;
> > +	if (rtw_pwr_wakeup(padapter)) {
> > +		ret = -EPERM;
> 
> Preserve the error code.
> 
> >  		goto exit;
> >  	}
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

Hi Dan,

Thanks very much for the review. I'll get a V2 sent out shortly.

Regards,
Phil

      reply	other threads:[~2022-07-25 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-24 16:30 [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_pwr_wakeup to correct error code semantics Phillip Potter
2022-07-24 18:39 ` Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-25 21:05   ` Phillip Potter
2022-07-25 10:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-25 21:03   ` Phillip Potter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yt8FBtHnNCGSZAf/@equinox \
    --to=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=abdun.nihaal@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.