From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer "full" MMU setup until after vendor hardware_setup()
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:23:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtBfPU4lhPbuDJ3y@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ys3uDJ90dBeFFbka@xz-m1.local>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 11:27:33PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > @@ -11937,6 +11932,10 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
> >
> > kvm_ops_update(ops);
> >
> > + r = kvm_mmu_hardware_setup();
> > + if (r)
> > + goto out_unsetup;
> > +
> > kvm_register_perf_callbacks(ops->handle_intel_pt_intr);
> >
> > if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
> > @@ -11960,12 +11959,18 @@ int kvm_arch_hardware_setup(void *opaque)
> > kvm_caps.default_tsc_scaling_ratio = 1ULL << kvm_caps.tsc_scaling_ratio_frac_bits;
> > kvm_init_msr_list();
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +out_unsetup:
> > + static_call(kvm_x86_hardware_unsetup)();
>
> Should this be kvm_mmu_hardware_unsetup()? Or did I miss something?..
There is no kvm_mmu_hardware_unsetup(). This path is called if kvm_mmu_hardware_setup()
fails, i.e. the common code doesn't need to unwind anything.
The vendor call is not shown in the patch diff, but it's before this as:
r = ops->hardware_setup();
if (r != 0)
return r
there's no existing error paths after that runs, which is why the vendor unsetup
call is new.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 23:27 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: pte_list_desc fix and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number entries in a pte_list_desc with a ulong Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer "full" MMU setup until after vendor hardware_setup() Sean Christopherson
2022-06-25 0:16 ` David Matlack
2022-06-27 15:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-27 22:50 ` David Matlack
2022-07-12 21:56 ` Peter Xu
2022-07-14 18:23 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-06-24 23:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Shrink pte_list_desc size when KVM is using TDP Sean Christopherson
2022-07-12 22:35 ` Peter Xu
2022-07-12 22:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-13 0:24 ` Peter Xu
2022-07-14 18:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-24 23:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Topup pte_list_desc cache iff VM is using rmaps Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtBfPU4lhPbuDJ3y@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.