From: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: sunxi: sun6i_mipi_csi2.c/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c: clarify error handling
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 11:54:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtZ/VmLgnnn2tlAK@aptenodytes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <815bc07c-20ef-86ba-1492-54c77afc7a1f@xs4all.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3772 bytes --]
Hi Hans,
On Mon 18 Jul 22, 18:08, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Both sun6i_mipi_csi2.c and sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c have the same issue:
> the comment before the ret = 0 assignment is incorrect, drop it and
> always assign the result of the v4l2_subdev_call(..., 0) to ret.
Not sure what is incorrect about it. I agree that it's good to return the
return code of v4l2_subdev_call instead of always 0 on the !on path though.
> In the disable label check for !on and set ret to 0 in that case.
>
> This fixes two smatch warnings:
>
> drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c:193 sun6i_mipi_csi2_s_stream() warn: missing error code 'ret'
I don't think this is legit: the initialization of ret is specifically there
to avoid an undefined ret there.
> drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c:225 sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2_s_stream() warn: missing error code 'ret'
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
> ---
> .../media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c | 7 ++++---
> .../sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c | 7 ++++---
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c
> index 31e12f1506cb..a4e3f9a6b2ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-mipi-csi2/sun6i_mipi_csi2.c
> @@ -182,14 +182,13 @@ static int sun6i_mipi_csi2_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int on)
> unsigned int lanes_count =
> csi2_dev->bridge.endpoint.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
> unsigned long pixel_rate;
> - /* Initialize to 0 to use both in disable label (ret != 0) and off. */
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!source_subdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> if (!on) {
> - v4l2_subdev_call(source_subdev, video, s_stream, 0);
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(source_subdev, video, s_stream, 0);
> goto disable;
> }
>
> @@ -281,6 +280,8 @@ static int sun6i_mipi_csi2_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int on)
> return 0;
>
> disable:
> + if (!on)
> + ret = 0;
Then this will always overwrite the ret value from v4l2_subdev_call with the
!on disable path. Looks like this can be removed.
What do you think?
Paul
> phy_power_off(dphy);
> sun6i_mipi_csi2_disable(csi2_dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c
> index c82ede3ca0ff..d052ee77ef0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun8i-a83t-mipi-csi2/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c
> @@ -214,14 +214,13 @@ static int sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int on)
> unsigned int lanes_count =
> csi2_dev->bridge.endpoint.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes;
> unsigned long pixel_rate;
> - /* Initialize to 0 to use both in disable label (ret != 0) and off. */
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!source_subdev)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> if (!on) {
> - v4l2_subdev_call(source_subdev, video, s_stream, 0);
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(source_subdev, video, s_stream, 0);
> goto disable;
> }
>
> @@ -313,6 +312,8 @@ static int sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev, int on)
> return 0;
>
> disable:
> + if (!on)
> + ret = 0;
> phy_power_off(dphy);
> sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2_disable(csi2_dev);
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-19 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 16:08 [PATCH] media: sunxi: sun6i_mipi_csi2.c/sun8i_a83t_mipi_csi2.c: clarify error handling Hans Verkuil
2022-07-19 9:54 ` Paul Kocialkowski [this message]
2022-07-19 10:04 ` Hans Verkuil
2022-07-19 12:20 ` Paul Kocialkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtZ/VmLgnnn2tlAK@aptenodytes \
--to=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.